kwall

i'll take that as another "no" then.

i don't care to bother with articulating my side to you clowns.

i'm curious - who do you think my leaders are?

lay out "my side" as you see it and i'll try to defend it.

i've never read the "mainstream conservative doctrine", so i guess i'll take your word on this. i'll overlook your repeated implication that i may be lying and just ask, who should i be voting for?

no, just a little barb. to help you make the distinction i'll put [substance] tags around words that i think contain substance.

when i read substance that i think is worth responding to, i do. i menans i don't like you. the spelling just kinda jumped out at me and didn't want to pass up the opportunity to throw a dart at your ego.

good substance.

i don't really read your posts. you're on notice.

liberals never see conservative substance.

didn't you? sorry if i lumped you in with the 99% support for obama on this board. it gets my head spinning at times.

last i checked, you spoke of him lovingly.

nonetheless is one word.

does obama credit his speechwriters? when did you meet obama? yes we can! yes.

yeah, like obama will get.

hmm, this is kindof scant evidence, although i agree it doesn't look good. i also don't like the term "ban" for having books removed from a library, although she is quoted as saying so in this article. i need more info.

yeah, i wouldn't call these "gaffes".