Spawn's dad Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Which question? What's the point? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrRain422 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 There is no point. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Basil II Posted November 14, 2006 Author Share Posted November 14, 2006 people seem to cling to the idea that a firmer embrace of the middle ground will provide an answer to our myriad problems.the truth is truly left or right candidates are unelectable as these elections are decided by the undecided middle....dependent upon undecided voters in one or two states. the two party ticket seems to embrace the falacy that core members of the opposite party will vote for a ticket with a member of the opposite party on it, thus ensuring victory. A well reasoned point....... remember, the subtitle to this thread is "pie in the sky" So perhaps a viable third party option is an idea tried in the past with iffy success/consequences..........are we not more able now than in the past to shake things up across party lines??? "Bull Moose Party" anyone??? -Robert. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Heartbreak Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Hillary and Colin PowellNo one would dare assassinate the first woman president when it would automatically create the first black president.There, I said it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IRememberDBoon Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Michael Steele is a monstrous douche. I still cant believe Harold Ford Jr lost. I watched the Tenn debates and his opponent was beyond horrible. I don Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kilgoretrout Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 JB/KG Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.