mathew

i personaly like reading about music it is fun but alot of the sky blue sky reviews mainly the positive ones and of course the negative ones just havent got it, you know what i mean? if not then read this review it is the first review that i have come across that you know gets it, understands the art and when it dose not it thinks about why it dosent understand but ofcourse its not evreyones fault they dont understand(simple minds). http://www.avclub.com/content/music/wilco

I read pitchfork for news and they usualy have great albums in there best new music section but what i find discouraging is the trend of unknown artist getting great reviews that they might deserve while established artist like Wilco, Bjork, Ryan Adams w.e can be so easily bashed and i dont mean not geting the review that i think they deserve but instead i am talking about the 5 or 6 ratings that seem to be almost random in there relevence to the review or the music. My conspirency theory is that one pitchfork loves taking credit in making bands succesful i.e arcade fire, clap your hands sya

Has anyone seen jeffs solo performance at the vic 4/6/07? My apologies if this has been previously discussed, but i just watched it on you tube and its ridiculousy funny, along with performances of pot kettle black which i have never seen live acoustic and a funny sing along of jesus etc theres this 4 minute discussion of the sky blue sky interviews where jeff dose his best german reporter impression (realy good actualy) and a few other impressions one of which has the words black rose in it (enough said). Its definitely worth checking out, if you havent already. I have a feeling