Good Old Neon

That would rapturous, don

As someone who has been cast as the folksy, oh gosh oh golly, more human side of all the candidates involved, I found Palin

I made it up out of thin air, but I'm not going to ask that you worship me or create an entire fabricated religion because of it. In life, as in literature, I

I like and respect you both (bobbob and fathead) quite a bit, so I

Given your behavior in this and other threads, and that you show little interest in serious debate outside of taking points out of context and then using them to craft snarky, sarcastic replies of little to no substance or value, I won

No, I think about it quite a bit, as should be evident based on my post history. And, I would be willing to bet I

You're not alone.

I wish there was much more back and forth, because it's evident that Palin punches her self out after exhausting her talking points - if only this were a less structured format.

She's not going to answer the questions from the moderator because they're not part of her fucking script - jesus fucking christ.

So then you agree that some beliefs, and any actions resulting from those beliefs are justified, while others are not? Of course we are entitled to think whatever we choose to think, and by extension, believe whatever we choose to believe, I would never suggest otherwise, but as I said at the beginning of this line of discussion, thinking or believing something within the confines of your own mind does not make it so.

So then, Hitler

It doesn

So if I believe there

In honor of his death, I

I agree, but it strikes me as more than coincidence that conservative judges interpret the constitution using their own conservative biases, while liberal judges do the same, only more liberally. As much as we

True, but I

Don

And how is that different than any other justification for or against the nomination of a Supreme Court Justice? Neither party wants a truly unbiased judge on the bench

For a second there I was reading that as the Top 50 Films of all time, and I thought to myself, JC, who

Ahem

Unless of course change means being rescued from the interior of a burning skyscraper. With that said, I think there is a lot of truth in what you

I agree, unlike Gould, who believed science and religion are non-overlapping magisteria (NOMA), meaning, science can be used to explain the empirical universe, while religion is more adept at explaining the meaning of life, morals, etc

Naw, though I find politics every bit the equal of science/religion oriented debate, at this point and for the most part, I have dropped out of that topic. There are plenty of folks who post just as often as I do, have you also pointed out to them that you view their posting habits as a full time job

Sure, but I do enjoy discussing the topic, it

Many of which, unlike his