Jump to content

John Smith

Member
  • Content Count

    2,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John Smith

  1. whats worse? Christie's Chief of Staff making a bridge one lane for a week or President Clinton getting a BJ in the Oval Office?

    One is a sexual encounter outside of his marriage, the other is abusing his office for political retribution (Nixonian?). I'm going to guess the answer is...irrelevant because neither has anything to do with the other and the question is a mere diversion. Though Clinton was put through the ringer, I am going to guess that the present situation will quiet down and fade away.

  2. I'm not sure how saying "I wouldn't be surprised" can be described as "a total bs manner.'

     

     

    Flame throwing , tossing bullshit out with no evidence, bringing focus on something that does not exist. If none of this makes sense then I have nothing left to say.

     

    Oh wait I'll bet it was dirty dick starting shit against a perceived moderate (he's not) as revenge for moderate republicans handling of his daughter. That's got to be it. I have no proof I'm just offering it as a possibility.nothing wrong with that, is there?

  3. I never claimed that they had. You called it "a politically motivated story trying to discredit a presidential front runner" and I merely threw out the name of another presidential front runner who would stand to benefit by bringing the story to light.

    But you threw it out in a total bs manner. He was merely theorizing how this impossible bs theory could even be plausible. The democrats including Hilary had nothing to do with this, and a half assed attempt at balance simply helps to illustrate the absurd lengths people will go to in an attempt to attain balance.

  4. I say post blood and chocolate.

     

    This reminds me of an article I read years ago. The premise was that when we look at an Elvis Costello or a bob Dylan record... Do we judge them against what is being put out at the time? Or do we primarily judge them against their back catalog? I tend to think both but we weigh the back catalog more heavily in the equation than we might weigh their performance against peers.

  5. That's correct. If they actively participated though there would have been negative political fallout because it worked and they said it wouldn't. Whereas if they don't participate and it behaves as it is doing the pols can say see we told you so. They make no secrets about wanting it to fail.

  6. I've seen KISS three times now. I'm not a fan but went once just to say I did it and two more times for friends. I am one of those people who is not a fan, not because they are cheese rock but because they seem to only exist as a marketing vehicle for all the sh*t Gene dreams up to sell. His attitude about money and success turns my stomach. I'm not against any band making money, even KISS, but I tend not to like them when that is all they are about. Those three shows I saw over a six or seven year period were pretty close to identical.

  7. Most people think that welfare cheating was the sum of her existence, but she did so much more and far more heinous things in her life. She was seemingly always looking to fleece whomever she encountered and was always looking for the next victim. Welfare cheating was the least of it, but that's what got people's attention and she was used to paint all welfare recipients with the same brush strokes . Amazingly guys like Bernie Madoff are bad apples and never used as examples of a whole class, yet they probably touch more lives for more $$ over time.

  8. Not to change the subject, but Skate has a pretty good article about THE Welfare Queen brought up by the Reagan campaigns. It's really quite illuminating and she is not quite who she was portrayed to be...she was much worse, sort of a gypsy type of swindler. It really is worth the read.

×
×
  • Create New...