Jump to content

If everyone's a critic...


Recommended Posts

This article in the Village Voice was pretty amusing... not the least of which was the look back at some hilarious rankings (e.g., 1989 - Neneh Cherry's Raw Like Sushi #5).

 

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop06/0...t,75736,22.html

 

Critics' polls have evolved and arguably withered lately, but at least we didn't vote for Timbuk 3

by Chris Ott

 

Beyond its status as a discerning metric of the Bands That Matter in a given year, Pazz & Jop became one of the hottest potatoes in the field of music journalism in 2006, following the Voice's dismissal of its patriarch, Robert Christgau. Within the community the poll had consulted for nearly 35 years, its fate was a pressing concern rivaling the most important question of all: whether TV on the Radio, Clipse, or Bob Dylan released the year's best record.

P&J has grown in renown and influence since its early-'70s inception, curated and tallied

Link to post
Share on other sites
Finally, 2006 made it plain: Everyone who's telling you to listen to the same 50 records is caught in a closed loop of incestuous self-assurance, and you owe it to yourselves to leave them behind.

 

Ouch.

 

As a side note -- I think this is the guy that slammed Colin Meloy in the Voice a couple of months ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i remember back when a rolling stone review actually meant something. i think that was around the time the original star wars trilogy came out.

 

nowdays anyone can spout off that has access to the internet and paid music critics are now irrelevent. looking back now, they've probably always been. i can make up my own mind...thank you very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I didn't know the purpose of criticism was to help others make up their mind. Interesting.

what the hell else is it for then?

 

an avenue to vent about ones own shortcomings by placing the target on someone else?

 

that's what message boards are for.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Were you even born then??

 

LouieB

born in 1968

 

i think you were probably smoking your first doobie around that time...weren't you....come on louie..fess up!

 

i was one of the idiots waiting in line for hours outside our legendary local glenwood theater (now demolished) when the original star wars came out.

 

i see the end of rolling stone significance as starting with the late 70's and it was definately d.o.a. by the time MTV went on the air.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've said this before, but to me critics are at heart consumer protectionists, trying to alert people so they spend their entertainment dollar more effectively. That said, taste is the hardest thing of all to quantify - it can't be rated like one would rate toasters or water softeners. And some critics, who, it must be said, are artists themselves, can't resist showing off their chops at the expense of the reviewed, but I appreciate their efforts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While we wait for Beltmann's response, I'll jump in and say that I think I agree with the premise that a year-end critic list serves a different purpose depending on the audience: (i) for the die-hard fan, it spurs debate in bars and on message boards; and (ii) for the more casual fan, it serves as a road-map/cheat-sheet to music that he/she doesnt have the time to check out on his/her own.

 

So, no, the purpose of criticism isn't to help people make up their mind. But these lists aren't really critiques, are they? And with the advent of the internet and the relative ease with which one can stumble across indie recordings, it seems that the value provided by year-end lists and sites like RollingStone/Pitchfork is waning. I mean, shit, if I can post a review on a blog, who the hell needs Rolling Stone?

 

Still looking forward to hear from Beltmann though. :cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's been three days in waiting, beltmann must be cooking up something earth-shattering, or has forgotten about this thread.

 

with all this anticipation, will the response live up to the hype? what kind of backlash will come from those who see this delay as a lack of enthusiasm? Are the glory days behind him? Can he give the post of the year before it's even March?

 

the world waits.

Link to post
Share on other sites
what the hell else is it for then?

I waited for my question to sink in. Why, exactly, do Americans avoid foreign movies? Near the front of the class, a thoughtful high school junior squinted, pressed her lips together, and finally raised her hand. "I really believe that if the story was worth telling, it would have been made here first."

 

Did she mean that the United States has a monopoly on creativity? Or did she mean that stories about non-Americans, made by non-Americans, simply don't matter? One of the central functions of criticism, I think, is to root out such insular thinking, identify its causes, and ambush it at the source.

 

In other words, criticism is about modeling new ways of thinking about art in general, not changing opinions about works in specific. It

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the original article, and with what you just said. But I wasn't responding to the article... I was responding to UW's comments about criticism in general.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I suppose that makes more sense to me now. Oops. :lol

I edited for clarification.

 

Wish I had more time to elaborate on this, but I just don't. Life's been hectic, especially the last six months, which accounts for my infrequent posting around here. I miss our regular chats.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I waited for my question to sink in. Why, exactly, do Americans avoid foreign movies? Near the front of the class, a thoughtful high school junior squinted, pressed her lips together, and finally raised her hand. "I really believe that if the story was worth telling, it would have been made here first."

 

Did she mean that the United States has a monopoly on creativity? Or did she mean that stories about non-Americans, made by non-Americans, simply don't matter? One of the central functions of criticism, I think, is to root out such insular thinking, identify its causes, and ambush it at the source.

 

In other words, criticism is about modeling new ways of thinking about art in general, not changing opinions about works in specific. It

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...