Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah, it looks like it gets a little jump midway to the plate. Looking at his numbers, he's got fantastic control as well.

 

I'm not an expert on pitching mechanics but I think I know good from bad, and he doesn't look like he's got any red flags.

 

 

And the Marlins stadium has been approved by everyone it needs to be approved by. As far as I know, this is it. It's happening. Yay.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

FORT MYERS, Fla. -- Monday was a rough day for the back end of the Detroit Tigers' bullpen. Brandon Lyon and Fernando Rodney, the closer candidates, gave up seven runs in two innings.

 

Whose leg you gotta hump around here to get a closer?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jules
I'm not an expert on pitching mechanics but I think I know good from bad, and he doesn't look like he's got any red flags.

Remember when Mark Prior was lauded for his sound mechanics, proper use of his legs, etc. Look at him now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Remember when Mark Prior was lauded for his sound mechanics, proper use of his legs, etc. Look at him now.

 

The person who popularized the notion that Prior had "perfect" mechanics was in fact his own personal pitching coach.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jules
The person who popularized the notion that Prior had "perfect" mechanics was in fact his own personal pitching coach.

Maybe so, but everyone talked about his seemingly "effortless" delivery and strong use of his lower body. I'm just saying this kid has just as good a chance of blowing out his arm than anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prior used his lower body, sure, and he was so big that of course it looked effortless, but there were some pretty serious hitches in the rotation of his shoulder relative to his hips.

 

But more important than anything will be to get him to a team that understands how to develop young pitchers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RIP George Kell

 

Though not a Tigers fan, growing up in Michigan meant that Kell's voice was part of the soundtrack of my adolescence. He and Al Kaline made for a great broadcast team.

An amazing voice. They were Tigers baseball. Too bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I run into the same problem every year preparing for my rotisserie baseball auction. The preview magazines are woefully outdated, the free internet websites are decent, but not great, and the pay websites are pay so i dont want to waste money to find out I got ripped off.

 

What resources do folks here use?

Link to post
Share on other sites
I run into the same problem every year preparing for my rotisserie baseball auction. The preview magazines are woefully outdated, the free internet websites are decent, but not great, and the pay websites are pay so i dont want to waste money to find out I got ripped off.

 

What resources do folks here use?

 

bobbob1313

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know who Matt Wieters is. I have a feeling everyone else in my (keeper) league does too. Anyone else have thoughts on resources for an auction day crash course? Up to the minute depth charts, etc.? Is the closer in Texas CJ Wilson or Frank Francisco?

 

Also, I am going to go ahead and slap the keeper tag on Alexei Ramirez with his $1 salary (pats self on back).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really feel like Joe Sheehan gets it when it comes to steroids:

 

Schilling is also one of the approved "clean" players of his era. The process for gaining this label is largely inscrutable, but factors include quotability, skin tone, and affability. I'm going to be indelicate here and point out that Schilling is a pitcher who struggled to stay healthy for much of his career, and had his greatest effectiveness and durability late in that career. Through his age-29 season, Schilling had thrown 988 1/3 innings, had two 200-inning seasons (and didn't lose one to either strike-shortened campaign), and never received a Cy Young vote. From the ages of 30-33, he threw 200 innings three times, made three All-Star teams, and got Cy votes in one season. From 34-37, he was one of the best pitchers in baseball.

 

Maybe this doesn't mean anything, and frankly, I don't know or care what the reasons are for that career shape. What I do know is that "an oddly late peak" has been used as evidence against many players, and if the standards, such as they are, were applied to Schilling's stat lines, name removed, heads would be scratched. Schilling gets a pass because he's Curt Schilling, and not because any rigor has actually been applied to the issue. As I say, it's not my fight, but I find it curious why career shape matters for some people and not for others.

 

That being said, he thinks he's a hall of famer, but as usual he does a great job of pinpointing some of the inherent hypocrisy in the steroid era. Note, he's not accusing Schilling of using.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought the story was that Schilling quit his heavy boozing mid-career. Of course he could have used, though.

 

I could also be confusing him with someone else.

 

His point is that there are certain players and certain types of players who will never have the suspicion put on them. I personally think race has a lot to do with it, but I've always been pretty sensitive to the role race plays in the media's portrayal of athletes, but I think he brings up interesting points about quotability and affability in the discussion as well.

 

If anything Schilling's career followed an even less predictable path than Bonds', as Bonds was great (all time type of great) before he was older whereas Schilling never really put it together until he was older.

Link to post
Share on other sites
His point is that there are certain players and certain types of players who will never have the suspicion put on them. I personally think race has a lot to do with it, but I've always been pretty sensitive to the role race plays in the media's portrayal of athletes, but I think he brings up interesting points about quotability and affability in the discussion as well.

 

If anything Schilling's career followed an even less predictable path than Bonds', as Bonds was great (all time type of great) before he was older whereas Schilling never really put it together until he was older.

I understood what he meant, bobs! I don't disagree. I was just providing a possible explanation.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...