Jump to content

Hixter

Member
  • Content Count

    1,997
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hixter

  1. And Now that ahole in Alabama is defying the courts and pretty much saying that federal law does not trump state law. So we have one more defiant jerk. What makes us a nation is our laws and sticking to them. 

    Should federal law always trump state law? I'm not so sure about that, or we'd have the DEA raiding cannabis dispensaries in Denver, etc.

  2. Reposted from Facebook:

     

     

    The news that the great jazz pianist Paul Bley has passed has sent me into some deep reveries, sent my mind and heart on a few choice tangents. You see, Paul Bley has had a tremendous impact on my way of thinking about music, improvisation, and so-called jazz.

     
    I think I first heard his solo piano record "Open, To Love", the now-legendary ECM recording from the 70s. It contains pieces by Carla Bley and Annette Peacock that I still play to this day, as anyone who has followed my concerts over the last three decades or so may know. Songs like "Touching", "Ida Lupino", and "Albert's Love Theme" sent me to a moody and beautiful realm and they still do. Paul Bley, apparently not a composer - pieces attributed to him seem to be spontaneous improvisation - seemed to have, by virtue of his intimate relationships with these two singular composers, perhaps implicitly commissioned these works to showcase his uniquely blues-inflected and harmonically probing playing style, which was, by this time, quite free.
     
    I became quite obsessed with Paul Bley after this and, seeing as how I ended up working in a record store around this time that had tons of cut-out and obscure jazz records, I started catching up on the man's recorded output. His seminal trio recording "Footloose" (with Steve Swallow and Pete LaRoca), which even the generally ungenerous Keith Jarrett credits generously as an influential record, was a crucial step in my learning about how Bley had freed his trio of playing over song form/set chord progressions. This was no doubt an outgrowth of his intimate exposure to the music of Ornette Coleman, whom he hired (along with his entire band!) in 1958 at Los Angeles' Hillcrest Club. Bley had come out of be-bop, highly influenced by Bud Powell and Thelonious Monk. His adaptation of Ornette's "free jazz" seems to be the beginning of a lifelong path of playing songs with ultimate freedom and spontaneity. One can hear these recordings from 1958, as Bley used to cart around a reel-to-reel tape recorder and record gigs and rehearsals, leaving the world with invaluable documents of his work. ECM Records eventually released some of these "home recordings" on "Ballads" and "With Gary Peacock", two of my all-time favorite records. By the time I caught up with "Mr. Joy" (with Gary Peacock and the amazing and almost totally overlooked Billy Elgart) and "Turning Point" (with Gary Peacock, John Gilmore in one of his rare non-Sun Ra appearances, and Paul Motian), I was happily lost in Paul Bley's world. Even the photos for the "Mr. Joy" album had me reeling - the shot of Bley, ubiquitous pipe billowing smoke as Annette Peacock stretches in the window of their New York City loft… I started trying to write and improvise pieces that mimicked these compositions, tried to play guitar improvisations based on my neophyte impressions of Bley's style, his melodic and harmonic singularity and deep mood. This was maybe 1976 or '77, playing in the back room of my parents' house with my twin brother Alex (who really GOT what Barry Altschul and Billy Elgart were up to in this music) and our friend Lee Kaplan, who was just starting to play the acoustic bass and, as such, could play slowly enough to let the mood hang, suspend… It was probably pretty lame, but we were into it, and I felt a genuine pull towards this mode of expression. If you go back and listen to recordings by my first Trio and by The Singers, you will find that every one of these records has some floaty ballad that is directly influenced by this music I am writing about. Pieces like "The Rite", "Lucia", "The Divine Homegirl", "Recognize I & II", The Androgyne"… Records that followed on Bley's own I.A.I. (Improvising Artists Inc.) like "Virtuosi" (more ballads!) and "Alone (Again) - perhaps just as great as "Open, To Love", fueled my obsession.
     
    I only saw Paul Bley play 'live' on one occasion, and that was in the mid-70s. My friend Lee - mentioned in the above paragraph - and I flew to San Francisco late one night to catch him in what we thought was to be a duo concert with Gary Peacock, who was also one of our musical heroes and who had an amazing track record of serious chemistry with Bley. Back in those days, one could fly standby at 11PM from Los Angeles to San Francisco for $17! And Bley, having lived for many years in the 50s in Los Angeles, seemed to avoid it like the plague now, so north we headed, staying with a voracious jazz collector Lee knew named Michael Rubinoff, who had an apartment in Diamond Heights (it was during this stay that I ended up hearing a super-rare record called "The Horizon Beyond" by the Attila Zoller Quartet, another revelatory and long-lasting musical awakening). The concert was at The Great American Music Hall, and could not have been a more perfect venue. But it turned out that this was a solo concert, not a duo gig with Gary Peacock, which probably had my bassist friend Lee whimpering inside with disappointment. I, too, felt a pang of woe. But the concert was unadulterated, classic Paul Bley solo piano. I had heard that he always put a New York City phone book on the piano bench to achieve extra height, and indeed he WAS sitting on a phone book, his legs coolly crossed, though I have no idea if it was really of the NYC strain. But I do remember a particularly harsh, polytonal rendering of "Mr. Joy", and a moving and almost funky version of "Ida Lupino". I was in heaven… Lee was also doing a bit of music writing back then and seemed to have entree to all sorts of backstage situations, which usually left me feeling awkward and self-conscious. But backstage we went, wherein I guess I shook Paul's hand at some point - I really don't recall. Bley was such a daunting figure - a legendary hustler, exuding supreme command and self assurance, pulling the strings, as it were. I was afraid of him! I ended up outside with the guitarist Bill Conners, with whom I had been ready to study until he strangely blew me off, and had a completely weird almost-conversation with him until Bley emerged and exclaimed, "Come, William!" and they were gone. Bill Conners - a fantastic and fascinating guitarist - had been playing some with Bley at that time, as he did n the I.A.I release "Quiet Song"…
     
    Paul Bley went on to release dozens and dozens of recordings, many of them solo piano improvisations or reinterpretations of jazz warhorses or the Carla Bley/Annette Peacock canon. In the late 80s he reunited with ECM and released two recordings of The Paul Bley Quartet with John Surman, Bill Frisell, and Paul Motian that are, to my mind, miracles of deep listening. When things get a little too hooked-up, too unified or extemporaneously tonal, Bley tosses in some new idea to skew the tonal center, to push the music forward. He also reunited with Charlie Haden and Paul Motian (one of my favorite rhythm sections of all time) for some wonderful recordings.
     
    I read that Paul died of natural causes at his home in Florida, surrounded by his family, after teaching and continuing to play and record for many years. I guess I lost the thread a bit and need to catch up on some of this later work. But his influence on me continues to be strong, pervasive. The great guitarist Jeff Parker and I, when we discovered that we both adore the record "Turning Point, started a quartet with Nate McBride and Frank Rosaly to play those songs together, which we still are able to do occasionally. And my upcoming double record "Lovers", to be released this summer, features three pieces that became known to me because of Paul Bley: "Cry, Want" by Jimmy Giuffre, and two Annette Peacock compositions done as a suite, "So Hard It Hurts" and "Touching". The 'live' disc from my band The Singers' CD "Initiate" has a version of Carla Bley's "And Now The Queen", which Paul Bley interprets so beautifully on "Alone (Again)". I am still trying to absorb this music and let it infiltrate my work. I find it to be sublime.
     
    When I was working at the record store back when, there was a painter who came in all the time to buy jazz records, which he listened to while he worked. We would often end up in discussions and gently heated bouts of opinion regarding records, and I was always trying to get him to get into Paul Bley. But he always said the same thing: "His stuff is just too…COOL for me", by which I think he meant both cool as in hip and cool as in icy. There is no doubt in my mind that Paul Bley was, musically-speaking, the hip kind of cool. Just take a listen and look at the man circa 1966! But icy?… I think "considered" is what describes what may be mistaken for "icy" - his cogent use of space, dissonance, all with a decidedly bluesy inflection - which is just fucking cool, yes. But beyond these coolness considerations, I feel drawn into a very personal world, an intimate state of reverie informed by highly developed musicality and restrained yet palpable emotion. Maybe you can dig what I am saying - if you listen.
     
    Paul Bley, rest in peace. Thank you for your music.
     
    New York City
    (January 7, 2016)

     

     

  3. this is speculation on my part, but i would imagine that if you have an electric car, you actually drive it less than a conventional car, in terms of total miles. does anyone who's got an electric car care to chime in?

    I think the Chevy Volt has an all-electric range of about 40 miles, so I suppose that may be true. The more popular Tesla's get more than 200 miles per charge, so I doubt they affect anyone's driving habits except for when it comes to cross country trips.

  4. Yeah, I'm actually kind of with you Hix, expanded wind and solar with a nuclear back bone would clean up the air real quick, and it would make those newfangled electric cars more effective.

    It seems like the most realistic alternative to drilling mile-deep holes in the ground and then transporting the contents halfway across the planet.

  5. For the life of me I am not sure what Hixter thinks would be effective.

    As far as reducing gun crime? My first suggestion would be more cops on the street.

     

    I am not sure why you have to limit it to nuclear power.  Why not a worldwide Manhattan Project for energy, with no option off the table.

    Fine with me. I just can't think of any other feasible source of vast amounts of energy that works 24/7. Renewables are fine, but we'll always need a backup source for cloudy days, calm days, etc.

  6. When I was in California I was reading the paper and found out that some biofuel power plants are at risk of shutting down because they're being out priced by solar energy.

     

    When I got home to Colorado there was a story on the radio about how owning an electric car in my state is not much better than a typical gas engine because most of our electricity comes from coal.

     

    It might not grab as many clicks as gun debates, or as emotional rhetoric form the average Joe, or Nancy, but the energy discussion is going to get pretty busy over the next several decades.  There's a lot going on, and some potential for positive innovation.

    Lots of trash that people painstakingly sort into recycle bins ends up in landfills because there's no market for it. Aluminum, yes, but glass and paper are not in much demand. 

     

    Electric cars are cool, but if they're powered by electricity generated by fossil fuels, what's the point?

     

    Solar power and wind turbines are nice, but they are an unreliable source of energy. There should be a worldwide Manhattan Project II to develop a cheap, safe nuclear power plant design that can be built everywhere without serving as a vector to obtaining nuclear weapons.

  7. do you think he is overstepping the powers of the office by issuing such executive actions?    

    I'm quite certain that a team of lawyers spent months ensuring that the actions were within the scope of the law. But that doesn't necessarily mean they're a good thing. From what I've seen, they'll likely prove to be completely ineffective in reducing gun violence. But they'll inconvenience law-abiding gun owners and cost them some money and that's essentially what most new gun legislation has been all about. The rest is theater.

     

    Yeah, it's easy to not get sad and angry over dead children.

    Of course, but would it be any different if the head of the NRA got all teary eyed on national television at the grave of a young child who was killed at a school that was a declared gun-free zone? I'd consider both instances to be extremely tacky.

  8. It would seem anger is one of the easier ways to manipulate people.

     

    I think this is the unofficial slogan of the Trump campaign.   

    Invoking anger, sadness and dead children are among the oldest tricks of the propaganda trade. The president scored a hat trick at today's gun control event.

     

    arBWqof.jpg

  9. Imagine disenfranchised, angry black guy holes up in a post office with a sidearm.  You don't think law enforcement would take that person down immediately, as opposed to the kid gloves this self-described militia is being handled with?

    By "taking down" do you mean killing him or just arresting him? If you're talking about shooting him, it would be unlikely unless he pointed a gun at someone else. If you're talking about storming the building to arrest him, there would typically be no rush to do so. If there are no threats to anyone's life, the cops would try to talk him down or wear him down until he surrendered. Any attempt to storm the building would be put off until there was no other option and the cops would spend quite some time coming up with a detailed plan of action. (In the Oregon case, it appears that the men are well-armed and have excellent defensive positions, so any attempt to storm the building would be dangerous for everyone involved.)

     

    A better example would be if a bunch of Black Lives Matter protesters took over a building. The last things the cops would want to do would be to prove the protesters' point by killing a bunch of black men on national TV. As long as no lives were threatened, the authorities would do their best to avoid the confrontation that the protesters sought.

  10. Soooo... how about the armed militia that took over government property? Pretty weird huh?

    I haven't paid much attention to the story, but they sound like a bunch of attention seekers intent on making the news. The jailed(?) ranchers say that they're unwelcome and presidential candidates are calling for them to stand down and obey the law. The administration is following a smart policy that realizes that making martyrs of them would only fan the flames, so I expect a peaceful resolution. It's in everyone's best interests.

     

    Topics like this keep the really important and tricky subjects out of the news and I think both parties like it that way.

  11. months ago, motorhead had to cancel some shows cause he was sick. .on one, i read he made it to the second song and had leave the stage and the show was over

    I think it was the third song and it was in Austin. 

  12. OK then, the figures can be discounted because two viable answers weren't even included as options:

     

    1) I have no opinion on Islam.

    2) I have a neutral opinion on Islam.

     

    Without those two possible answers, the survey writer is purposely herding the answers towards being positive or negative. 

    Of course the writer was herding the answers to be either positive or negative. The question asked was "Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the Islamic religion?"

  13. Whoops. Can't wait to find out if this is a law-abiding citizen or not. Even if the idiot doesn't have a CCW permit, there have been plenty of other examples of people who do have permits but still put the rest of us in danger due to carelessness. 

    Not sure what this has to do with my NRA comments that you quoted?

     

    Negligent discharges are always going to happen, even when you're dealing with highly trained police officers and soldiers. I remember reading an article that said that armed cops in the UK negligently discharged their weapons more frequently than they were intentionally discharged.

     

    Thank you for jumping on this one and providing the full results of the poll.

     

    The right wing's go-to strategy is to provide incomplete and/or misleading "facts" to their low-information base, knowing full well that few will actually dig deeper on their own. Unfortunately for Hixter, this forum tends to be a little more savvy. 

    Sorry, but the figures cannot be discounted just because 25% of respondents had no opinion. The poll was a Huffington Post project and they are decidedly not right wing, but that didn't stop them from leading their story with this line:

     

    A majority say that they view Islam unfavorably, and even Democrats are almost twice as likely to view Islam negatively than positively

     

    Facts is facts.

×
×
  • Create New...