caliber66 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Dear. Mr. mathew: "Allot" does not mean what you think it means. Sincerely,caliber Quote Link to post Share on other sites
So Long Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Well, that's because George Bush himself blew it up. And he would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for those meddling bloggers, who, with their keen powers of insight, were able to do what the combined powers of the 9/11 commission, 500+ congressmen and women, and the entirety of the media were unable to do. I mean, come on. Something this big would not be possible to cover up in today's day and age. The media is too all over things, and somebody would've said something. haha. Very true. I'm skeptical of everything, but a 9/11 conspiracy seems highly unlikely to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mathew Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Dear. Mr. mathew: "Allot" does not mean what you think it means. what do you mean, and Im being egnuine well I do know that Bloomberg said what I claimed he said and I am very enveuous of you expirences with ChompskyI wish I could say I had the same expiriences, I suppose Bloomberg could have said what he said to make himself look good and might have never even consulted chompsky Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 chompsky Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Wow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Wow.asshole. that was fast Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Elixir Sue Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 chompskyThis is still making me giggle. Edit: Nice one, 2bobs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 chompskychompskychompsky Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I'm giggling like crazy right now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 The main thing I've taken from this discussion it that this is a really useful button of which some people should take better advantage. That, and that Noam really should have been named Chompsky. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 well I do know that Bloomberg said what I claimed he said and I am very enveuous of you expirences with ChompskyI wish I could say I had the same expiriences, I suppose Bloomberg could have said what he said to make himself look good and might have never even consulted chompsky Mathew, please don Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Sounds like a pokemon, or something. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Panther Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Chomsky aside , The 911 commission is a piece of crap, do your own research I don Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Dear. Mr. mathew: "Allot" does not mean what you think it means. what do you mean, and Im being egnuineYou are using the word "allot," which means "distribute" or "parcel out," as if it means the same thing as "a lot," which means "several." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mathew Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 oh no I wont take it personally and thank you for being kind about that. I certainly have alot to learn when it comes to politics and have a completlyopenmind. infact you are right it wasnt Bloomberg it was Gravel who said that about Chomsky and Nader my sincerest appologies. That sorta changes allot, but my initial point was Noam Chomsky is in no position to go to the level of filling in the blanks about 911, My favorite part of his argument is that they do worse things in the open so who cares, which is sadly very ture. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 oh no I wont take it personally and thank you for being kind about that. I certainly have alot to learn when it comes to politics and have a completlyopenmind. infact you are right it wasnt Bloomberg it was Gravel who said that about Chomsky and Nader my sincerest appologies. That sorta changes allot, but my initial point was Noam Chomsky is in no position to go to the level of filling in the blanks about 911, My favorite part of his argument is that they do worse things in the open so who cares, which is sadly very ture.yikes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 William Wallace? ha HA! Busted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I'm being egnuine. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
aricandover Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 I'm being egnuine. ingenue Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.