Jump to content

The lead up to the War in Iraq revisited


Recommended Posts

Knowing what we now know, which in many ways, we did know, if you read or listened to sources outside of the mainstream press, the following speech is a staggering failure of epic proportions. I re-read it this morning, and was awestruck by the sheer amount of dishonesty found within. And I say dishonesty because, as already noted, there were those outside the mainstream media who had already cast large doubts on the Administration's evidence.

 

The link: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20...20021007-8.html

 

Bush

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the cool things about YHF is that it was completed before 9/11, yet inadvertantly seems to provide a perfect commentary on the times that followed (2002-03).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to rain on the parade here, but there is an amazing documentary/piece done by Bill Moyers that traces all of this lead up to the Iraq war called "Buying the War"...required viewing...you may watch here:

 

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html

 

Now, back to the funny.

 

 

 

 

Nipples.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to rain on the parade here, but there is an amazing documentary/piece done by Bill Moyers that traces all of this lead up to the Iraq war called "Buying the War"...required viewing...you may watch here:

 

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html

 

Now, back to the funny.

 

 

 

 

Nipples.

That was good, as well as Frontline's recent "Bush's War" shows.

 

Nurples.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The response from the White House and from the sources has been interesting. They deny of course, sort of deny that is. The White House has chosen to take the high road and condemn Suskind, a Pulitzer prize winner, for his gutter journalism. Of course any and all involved would deny and probably should deny it publicly. After all who wants to admit publicly that they broke the law? However Suskind has the interviews on tape and has offered to make them available if needed. When not coerced it is hard to deny your actual words, though many have done just that and sometimes successfully. Terrell Owens comes to mind right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The response from the White House and from the sources has been interesting. They deny of course, sort of deny that is. The White House has chosen to take the high road and condemn Suskind, a Pulitzer prize winner, for his gutter journalism. Of course any and all involved would deny and probably should deny it publicly. After all who wants to admit publicly that they broke the law? However Suskind has the interviews on tape and has offered to make them available if needed. When not coerced it is hard to deny your actual words, though many have done just that and sometimes successfully. Terrell Owens comes to mind right now.

 

Yep, it

Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately, our news cycle now moves at such a speed, and the media interest so shallow, that a critical mass of public outrage is never reached. So, at the end of his term, Bush and his buddies will walk away, never to be held responsible for the monumental mess they set in motion.

 

 

This is why I try to listen to the BBC as much as I can. They don't take historic level stories and boil it down to a 20 second sound bite. They aslo tend to ask the follow up questions that seem to be lacking in our press today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...