starbuck Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Listened to it twice. Liked it better the second time. Still not thrilled though which is really disappointing. Some things I don't like: Nels, Jeff's singing in a different range, songs sound similar. But I do love Wilco so I will listen to this a zillion times before I give my final opinion. Surprisingly I really like On and On and On, I never really liked that one, but here it sounds great. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilco LP #7 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I think that this album (as amazing as it sounds) is going to sound best in May, when it's being released. Imagining listening to this one at a barbeque or something (yuppie alert!). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Rufer Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 No doubt. I can't wait until May to barbecue, slug brews, play horseshoes, and listen to this jammy with friends. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danelectro Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I don't have any friends. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orkie Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 SBS sounds like The Eagles, and that's not my scene. Even Tweedy's voice reminds me of Glenn Fry in spots. The Grateful Dead feel that the jam-solos seem to emulate is also not something  That's an insult to the Eagles and the Dead. This album is like 70's adult rock, but with ZERO melodies or worthwhile songs. It would be great if it had the top notch melodies of the Dead or the Eagles, but it doesn't even have that. At least the Eagles and Dead had their own unique sound and wrote epic tunes. It doesn't even really have a jam band element either. It's like the most dull adult 70's rock album one could possibly dream up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Heartbreak Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I may be in the minority here - I frequently am - but I'm not big on the whole "grower" theory. Either something has an immediacy that does something for me, or it doesn't. If it doesn't, I don't feel obligated to subject myself to 40 listens or whatnot over a multi-week or even multi-year period. There's so much great music out there that I thoroughly enjoy, and I own a ton of it. I'm not a masochist. I played AGIB a few times after it came out, shelved it, and that's it. I like some of the songs, but mainly in their live incarnations. When I go back to the disc, my feeling is still the same ... Period. So I don't go back to it much. I know, I know, people will say, "But if you let the music reveal itself to you through repeated listenings, it will flower like a --" You know what: just stop right there. I don't need to do that. I just picked up Funhouse by The Stooges and Physical Graffiti by Led Zeppelin. Two completely different groups who I've never gotten into (especially LZ ... most overplayed band on the radio when I was growing up). Much to my surprise, I really dug 95% of these discs on the first listen. Many of the LZ songs were familiar from radio, but not really known well, and most of the other tracks were a revelation. Great stuff. The Stooges CD isn't as classic, but it's still excellent (except for the last track, which is just noise). My point is, these CDs were new (to me, anyway), and, just like a lot of what I've acquired recently - some Coltrane, Bessie Smith, Kula Shaker, Kendra Smith, J.J. Johnson, etc etc - they will get some future play. If I buy something that doesn't cut it today, it's not going to cut it after I've subjected myself to it a million times. For me, it has nothing to do with how old I was when I heard it OR when it was recorded, either. It has to do with how good it is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tweedy42 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I don't really post here..but given that Wilco have just 'released' a new album I thought I may as well..So here's my contribution to the current SBS debate..The album is a big disappointment, and anyone who wants to say otherwise is only lying to themselves...The excitement of the recent live shows and revamped lineup has been replaced by something totally sterile and lifeless..No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc..The bands superb musicianship can't even save the SBS tunes..There isn't any bite whatsoever to the album, no edge.This is a definite downturn for Wilco..A shame to admit it, but it's trueAnd I gotta say that on this msgboard there is an element of the 'emperors new clothes' in the overall reaction to the album-why can't people admit that Wilco has made a bad album???..all the previous Wilco albums were 'growers', but I never once thought 'I'm not really diggin this'..This album gets more disappointing by the listen...I would be embarassed to play this album to my friends.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I don't really post here..but given that Wilco have just 'released' a new album I thought I may as well..So here's my contribution to the current SBS debate..The album is a big disappointment, and anyone who wants to say otherwise is only lying to themselvesActually, you're only lying to yourself if you believe that your criteria for rating an album are the only valid ones. The making and enjoyment of music is a personal experience, and is different from one person to the next. One man's chicken shit is another man's chicken salad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
quarter23cd Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Wow. I see things so much more clearly now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I don't really post here...The album is a big disappointment, and anyone who wants to say otherwise is only lying to themselves...I honestly don't know what this means. You can go back to not posting now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
starbuck Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 The album is a big disappointment, and anyone who wants to say otherwise is only lying to themselves...The excitement of the recent live shows and revamped lineup has been replaced by something totally sterile and lifeless..No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc..The bands superb musicianship can't even save the SBS tunes..There isn't any bite whatsoever to the album, no edge.This is a definite downturn for Wilco..A shame to admit it, but it's trueThis album gets more disappointing by the listen...I would be embarassed to play this album to my friends.. I so agree with you. After all those awesome live shows recently and Jeff's solo shows which were outstanding and we get this?!! I just can't believe they came out with this. What were they thinking?!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tweedy42 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Ok dudes, keepr rockin The via chicago Stanlinists are shutting me down 'any criticism of Wilco results in a trip to a Gulag' Whatever you want to believe, I guess Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 What were they thinking?!!It's a secret. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tweedy42 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Respect Starbuck I got your back, we'll take them all Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Ok dudes, keepr rockin The via chicago Stanlinists are shutting me down 'any criticism of Wilco results in a trip to a Gulag' Whatever you want to believe, I guessIf you read my first impression of the album, you'll realize your "via chicago 'Stanlinists'" comment is a bit off the mark. There's a difference between criticizing Wilco (which I have done this week) and saying that anyone who likes the new album is lying to himself. Grow up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kilgore Trout Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Ok dudes, keepr rockin The via chicago Stanlinists are shutting me down 'any criticism of Wilco results in a trip to a Gulag' and anyone who wants to say otherwise is only lying to themselves Pot Kettle Black. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
m_to_the_c Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I think it sounds like nothing. Oh that's right, I'm still trying to get it! Anyone want to hook a brother up here? YSI, email, what have you Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc. No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc. No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc. No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc..ditto Quote Link to post Share on other sites
quarter23cd Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 It's a secret.Does Pat know? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TCP Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I don't understand the "growing" thing. Every other Wilco album from Being There to A Ghost Is Born (especially A Ghost Is Born) was a grower. Sky Blue Sky was the first Wilco album that I liked on first listen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I don't really post here..but given that Wilco have just 'released' a new album I thought I may as well..So here's my contribution to the current SBS debate..The album is a big disappointment, and anyone who wants to say otherwise is only lying to themselves...The excitement of the recent live shows and revamped lineup has been replaced by something totally sterile and lifeless..No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc..The bands superb musicianship can't even save the SBS tunes..There isn't any bite whatsoever to the album, no edge.This is a definite downturn for Wilco..A shame to admit it, but it's trueAnd I gotta say that on this msgboard there is an element of the 'emperors new clothes' in the overall reaction to the album-why can't people admit that Wilco has made a bad album???..all the previous Wilco albums were 'growers', but I never once thought 'I'm not really diggin this'..This album gets more disappointing by the listen...I would be embarassed to play this album to my friends..(Dumbest) Post of the day! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
uncle wilco Posted March 8, 2007 Author Share Posted March 8, 2007 let's keep this thing civil. i really don't want to have to close this thing if at all possible. i'm not just interested in hearing your opinion on the album [good or bad], but also the actual reason why. it's interesting to me at least to see things from another perspective. anybody can throw tomatoes. bring some reasoning, or start your own thread. there's been some pretty enlightened comments so far and i don't want the axe-grinders scaring people off or sending this conversation down the toilet. Â be nice. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
imsjry Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I don't really post here..but given that Wilco have just 'released' a new album I thought I may as well..So here's my contribution to the current SBS debate..The album is a big disappointment, and anyone who wants to say otherwise is only lying to themselves...The excitement of the recent live shows and revamped lineup has been replaced by something totally sterile and lifeless..No self respecting Wilco would've been wishing for an album of substandard versions of lonely 1, far far away and hummingbird etc..The bands superb musicianship can't even save the SBS tunes..There isn't any bite whatsoever to the album, no edge.This is a definite downturn for Wilco..A shame to admit it, but it's trueAnd I gotta say that on this msgboard there is an element of the 'emperors new clothes' in the overall reaction to the album-why can't people admit that Wilco has made a bad album???..all the previous Wilco albums were 'growers', but I never once thought 'I'm not really diggin this'..This album gets more disappointing by the listen...I would be embarassed to play this album to my friends..  Holy crap. This wins asshole post of the year. Thanks for telling me what I like and don't like. And even after all of your trying, I love the new disc AND I'm playing it for my friends. How about them Chinese Apples? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 be nice. Holy crap. This wins asshole post of the year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.