Central Scrutinizer Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Yeah, I feel the same way about god as well.If that's the case, God doesn't breathe, he puckers. Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Interesting, as it is very likely that religion Link to post Share on other sites
uncool2pillow Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Yeah, I feel the same way about god as well.You acknowledged a belief about God. The theists win! Game, set, match! Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Yeah, I feel the same way about god as well. isn't that impossible? Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 But his vegetables were sacred! Inspiration from the underlying principles of a theology. How do you maintain your footing? Easy, I take a proposition such as Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 isn't that impossible? That was a joke. But seriously, I hate Sauron too, and he Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 It just seems rather pointless to me that you can say the greatest works of art, the deepest throughts and inspirations are the product of zoological accidents, that the appreciation of the depth and development of these accidents can be pursued intellectually. That idea seems to fall in upon itself. There should be no pursuit of art because it is at its face value, accidents and false. Until you can prove otherwise (and the onus is on you to prove otherwise), that is what it is Link to post Share on other sites
lost highway Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 That was a joke. But seriously, I hate Sauron too, and he Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Until you can prove otherwise (and the onus is on you to prove otherwise), that is what it is Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Awwww. After finally catching up on reading this thread, I was just thinking, "Damn, atheism is so hawt!" It's true. See, PANTHER, what did I say, atheism brings in the hawt chicks. Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 ...but if nobody has actually found the answers yet, how is the onus on any one person? That was a sort of universal you Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 That was a sort of universal you Link to post Share on other sites
the carlos Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 after reading most of this I would like to declare that I'm going to believe in what I want and you can do something else. Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 after reading most of this I would like to declare that I'm going to believe in what I want and you can do something else. Until you can prove otherwise (and the onus is on you to prove otherwise), that is what it is... Link to post Share on other sites
the carlos Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Until you can prove otherwise (and the onus is on you to prove otherwise), that is what it is...condescending prick! Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 question still stands...if nobody has actually found the answers yet, how is the onus on any one person or universal group of people? Because if you Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 the evidence is no where but in the heart Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 It's experiential. Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Also, can I get out of this thread without getting any onus on me? Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 is that like splooge? Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 You have to back it up something other than opinion. no, they don't. you have a very strong opinion, based on scientific research so far, but it's still just an opinion...w/ some or a lot of holes (depending on what side of the debate you are on)...that someone could use the concept of a higher power or source, to explain. nobody has onus here. frankly, it's a silly conversation to demand it in...unless, of course, you're goal is to prove somebody wrong and yourself right. eh, whatever. have a good weekend, dude. this arguement will be here on monday...and eternity after that. Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 only 455 posts until this thread is closed... Link to post Share on other sites
Central Scrutinizer Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Until you can prove otherwise (and the onus is on you to prove otherwise), that is what it is Link to post Share on other sites
Central Scrutinizer Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Until you can prove otherwise (and the onus is on you to prove otherwise)\No, actually the onus is on you -- "a" theism. By very nature of the word you are the contrarian. Link to post Share on other sites
Central Scrutinizer Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 That was a sort of universal you Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts