Good Old Neon Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 dude, you couldn't carry Beltmann's IFC book bag. that cat really is the intellectual you seem to try really hard to be. I have no issue w/ anybody cut and pasting to help along a conversation or cite a fact for sake of argument. see? the difference here, again, is that you seem to present these things in lieu of your own formulated thought. i won't argue the math w/ you, but you do it more than you may think you do. speaking of Beltmann...$9.99 at Suncoast Video, B! i thought the KISS rock and roll over car air freshner i found over lunch on tuesday was the best find ever, but (obviously) that was incorrect. only the yellow jumpsuit itself would be cooler. I know, you Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 that isn't much of a choice there buddy. 13 bionic eyes!? you better pee in another jug and get yourself checked out. Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Please El Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 We put ourselves at the center of existence and ascribe value to ourselvesIndeed. It may be arrogant and self-centered, but what's the alternative? Hopeless nihilism? The irony here is - a tree is more signifigant to the overall Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 speaking of Beltmann...$9.99 at Suncoast Video, B! i thought the KISS rock and roll over car air freshner i found over lunch on tuesday was the best find ever, but (obviously) that was incorrect. only the yellow jumpsuit itself would be cooler.SWEET! I don't care what the universe thinks--that T-shirt fuckin' matters! Link to post Share on other sites
OOO Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 In the grand scheme of things, when the intergalactic laser satellite array prevents earth from being destroyed by moon sized asteroids in 2183, the earth will be pleased. Furthermore, when, in the year 4.5 billion, the sun begins to expand and threatens to engulf the earth in a firey inferno (look this up), we divert the earths orbit with quantum accelerators and inertial dampeners, then too will earth be proud of her monkey children. Trees are fine and all, but in the long term they aren't really going to protect the earth. Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 that cat really is the intellectual you seem to try really hard to be. But you got me all wrong... If I could abort 50 fetuses in exchange for new outfielders for my softball team, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Plus, I bought a whoopee cushion today. True story. Link to post Share on other sites
Basil II Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Earth..........REDUCED TO CINDERS!!??!! -Robert. Link to post Share on other sites
OOO Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 From Wikipedia: The Sun does not have enough mass to explode as a supernova. Instead, in 4 Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Thought I'd add this to the discussion: Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Once? My head's in someone's vagina at least twice a week. Link to post Share on other sites
Basil II Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Touche' ....I think..... -Robert. Link to post Share on other sites
viatroy Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Once? My head's in someone's vagina at least twice a week. above and beyond the call of conjugal duty, Eric. Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Well, the search for life must go on... Link to post Share on other sites
viatroy Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 (They have tests for that now dude ... you can pick em up at any drug store.) Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 I almost included a similar pic with my last post!! Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 really, it comes down to making a personal call on which is more reasonable: abstinence or the oral sex. Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 But you got me all wrong... If I could abort 50 fetuses in exchange for new outfielders for my softball team, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Plus, I bought a whoopee cushion today. True story. i don't care how much of an intellectual you are...farts are funny. if i had to choose between oral sex and saving myself from a burning building... ...i'm still thinking. Link to post Share on other sites
Lammycat Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 if i had to choose between oral sex and saving myself from a burning building... ...i'm still thinking.Why is one necessarily exclusive of the other, though? Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Why is one necessarily exclusive of the other, though? it's just a hypothetical i use on pro-lifers when i'm trying to get them to blow me. Link to post Share on other sites
ction Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Here's a hypothetical question for all you smart people...if God had high speed internet, do you think he would read/participate in this thread or surf over to youporn and watch some reverse cowgirl action? Link to post Share on other sites
Gobias Industries Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Here's a hypothetical question for all you smart people...if God had high speed internet, do you think he would read/participate in this thread or surf over to youporn and watch some reverse cowgirl action? He would read/participate while getting himself some reverse cowgirl action. obv Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Wow, you really, really missed all the nuances of what I said in this thread. What I said is that in our current political and social climate, and in light of the emotional, psychological, medical, and private aspects wound up in the issue, a government intervention is not the most useful, effective means of combating abortion. Would I personally oppose abortions that happen legally? Yes. To be meaningful and enforceable, all laws must be pragmatic. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts