Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ok so i am a huge fan of the journalist/essayist chuck klosterman, and have been reading various collections of his older/more significant essays. before each one, he poses a question to the reader that (usually) is somehow conceptually related to the subject matter of the essay. i find the majority of the questions really interesting, so i figure it would be equally interesting to hear some peoples' responses. ill post a few, and if you guys like them ill continue :/

 

Let us assume you met a rudimentary magician. Let us assume he can do five tricks - he can pull a rabbit out of his hat, he can make a coin disappear, he can turn the ace of spades into the Joker card, and two others in a similar vein. These are his only tricks and he can't learn any more; he can do only these five. HOWEVER, it turns out he's doing these five tricks with actual magic. It's not an illusion; he can actually conjure the bunny out of the ether and he can move the coin through space. He's legitimately magical, but extremely limited in scope and influence.

 

Would this person be more impressive than Albert Einstein?

 

It is 1933. You are in Berlin, German. Somehow, you find yourself in a position where you can effortlessly steal Adolf Hitler's wallet. This theft will not effect Hitler's rise to power, the nature of World War II, or the Holocaust. There is no important identification in the wallet, but the act will cost Hitler forty Reichsmarks and completely ruin his evening. You do not need the money. The odds that you will be caught committing this crime are less than 2 percent.

 

Are you ethically obligated to steal Hitler's wallet?

 

anyways, enjoy :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The magician would be more impressive because I get to actually meet him. Einstein is just a historical figure to me.

 

No, I do not feel I'd be ethically obligated to steal Hitler's wallet. Apparently, he was not a happy man and one ruined evening would not make me feel any better about anything. Besides, stealing is not good karma.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I would steal Hitler's wallet, give it to the magician, and ask him if he could make a rabbit jump out of it every time he opens it up. Then I would return it to Hitler, sans 40 clams.

 

That would HAVE to affect history to some degree.

Link to post
Share on other sites
More entertaining, yes. More impressive, no.

 

And you are ethically obligated not to steal Hitler's wallet.

 

As a magician, yes, this person would be a league above Einstein in skill and craft, as a physicist/mathematician however, probably not so much.

 

Though your answer is, technically, ethically correct, all bets are off and some ethical standards can be relaxed when the subject being trespassed against is the fuehrer himself

Link to post
Share on other sites
thats very shortsighted in my opinion. moral obligations dont go out the window just because of someones actions.

Huh?

 

As a magician, yes, this person would be a league above Einstein in skill and craft, as a physicist/mathematician however, probably not so much.

 

Though your answer is, technically, ethically correct, all bets are off and some ethical standards can be relaxed when the subject being trespassed against is the fuehrer himself

Link to post
Share on other sites
No, I do not feel I'd be ethically obligated to steal Hitler's wallet. Apparently, he was not a happy man and one ruined evening would not make me feel any better about anything. Besides, stealing is not good karma.

Somewhere in Germany someone said, "Nein!"

 

Magician = Einstein

Real magic vs. magical brain... it's a draw.

 

Stealing Hitler's wallet would be a fantastic story for around the water cooler/cocktail parties*, but not an ethical requirement. Shooting him would be an ethical requirement.

 

 

*Does anyone actually have cocktail parties anymore?

 

 

 

 

Next question please!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Stealing Hitler's wallet would be a fantastic story for around the water cooler/cocktail parties*, but not an ethical requirement. Shooting him would be an ethical requirement.

That's an interesting slant. Annoying Hitler is not worth the moral/ethical violation of stealing something from someone, and by no means an imperative. Stopping the holocaust and WWII before it started clearly is. But that assumes you KNEW that he was who he was and was going to do all that he did... but I guess that's not really what the question was.

 

As for the magician, I'll stick with Albert.

Link to post
Share on other sites
That's an interesting slant. Annoying Hitler is not worth the moral/ethical violation of stealing something from someone, and by no means an imperative. Stopping the holocaust and WWII before it started clearly is. But that assumes you KNEW that he was who he was and was going to do all that he did... but I guess that's not really what the question was.

 

As for the magician, I'll stick with Albert.

But if you didn't know who he was and was going to do all that he did, NOT stealing his wallet would be a moral imperative.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Agree. Then it's just stealing from some Austrian dude.

Fixed it for you.

 

Klosterman is overrated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...