Jump to content

General Political Thread


Recommended Posts

:rolleyes

 

So wait, a tape exists of Zimmermann punching his father in law, smashing his estranged wife's Ipad and threatening bodily harm with a firearm?  Well charges should be pending, I would think that the state has the right to charge Zimmerman, in the interest of public safety, regardless of S. Zimmerman's reluctance to do the same.

http://www.tmz.com/2013/09/11/george-zimmerman-home-security-footage/?adid=hero3

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

UGH I dont know why I try but mean one more point. Hes obviously holding the IPad away from his wife (there is full audio of this part from the 911 call) in this vid and doing something to it before he throws it. Why would he do that? Any ideas?

 

 

Quick question, isn't the Ipad community property up until the final divorce decree? It wouldn't be the first time a piece of electronics was destroyed accidently prior to a divorce being finalized.

 

I know I'm just speculating here as I don't have first hand information as to what occurred or the state of mind of those involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If George was the short fat guy, who's the HUGE fat guy?

haha no joke. George would surely need at least 5 or 6 rounds for that fella! dude is huge.

Quick question, isn't the Ipad community property up until the final divorce decree? It wouldn't be the first time a piece of electronics was destroyed accidently prior to a divorce being finalized.

 

I know I'm just speculating here as I don't have first hand information as to what occurred or the state of mind of those involved.

what are you on about? accidentally? like GZ accidentally shot Trayvon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Why would he do that? Any ideas?

 

 

what are you on about? accidentally? like GZ accidentally shot Trayvon.

 

 

I was merely throwing out ideas, per your request.

 

Try and keep up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you listen to the 911 call she made the other day its pretty clear whats going on with Zimmerman. its been clear to me ever since he said "these mother*kers always get away" and then Trayvon ended up in the ground

 

 

Enlighten me, please. I admit that it is not clear to me. What is going on with Zimmerman?

Maybe this is bad form to push a reply but seriously, no BS or baiting intended but as coherently as possible, what is so clearly going on with George Zimmerman? I honestly don't know what you mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Clearly this proves his wife is an idiot, I mean you gotta have your settings turned to automatically save any video you take to iCloud.  If you don't you will lose incriminating evidence of your husband threatening your ass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly this proves his wife is an idiot, I mean you gotta have your settings turned to automatically save any video you take to iCloud.  If you don't you will lose incriminating evidence of your husband threatening your ass.

true dat! should be in the cloud already

Maybe this is bad form to push a reply but seriously, no BS or baiting intended but as coherently as possible, what is so clearly going on with George Zimmerman? I honestly don't know what you mean.

hes a hothead whatever that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

true dat! should be in the cloud already

hes a hothead whatever that is.

 

hot·head  (hobreve.giftprime.gifhebreve.gifdlprime.gif)

n.
A quick-tempered or impetuous person.

 Well okay then. A hothead. All of this ranting and the final and succint explanation is that he is a hothead. Hell, at times I'm a hothead. By the above definition and your VC behavior, you're a hothead. Are you as upset about yourself as you are Zimmerman?

I'm not that worried about hotheads. I'm much more concerned about amoral murderers, rapists, etc. Much to the pleasure of all, I will no longer post about George Zimmerman. Thanks, IRDB, for the honest reply (and for not saying it in all caps like a hothead. BECAUSE HE GOT AWAY AND THE RIGHT DEMONIZED THE VICTIM!! GOOD GOD DO YOU REALLY NOT UNDERSTAND???).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not think a gun has to be visible or even present for a crime to have been committed. Oh he threatened that had one or implied and the others believe it, then it is so.

 

 

No one is talking about the catch 22 here. If he had the gun and her dad or someone felt threatened by the weapon and tried to disarm him he could use the stand your ground defense when it really would have been the other person who was feeling threatened and standing their ground. The gun would win out over the fists in the short term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While we are complaining about George Zimmerman (regardless of what you think the Martin shooting, Zimmerman seems like a pretty horrible person and not someone I want to waste anymore of my time thinking about), the GOP is at again.  They want to use the Debt ceiling as a bargaining chip in their fight to end the Affordable Care Act.  

 

http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/321491-house-gop-struggles-to-sell-obamacare-plan-to-conservatives

 

Playing with the full faith and credit of the United States because of a bill they don't like.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one is talking about the catch 22 here. If he had the gun and her dad or someone felt threatened by the weapon and tried to disarm him he could use the stand your ground defense when it really would have been the other person who was feeling threatened and standing their ground.

"Disarming" him would essentially be theft, assault and/or a threatening act. Smart people don't try to take someone's firearm, they remove themselves from the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not think a gun has to be visible or even present for a crime to have been committed. Oh he threatened that had one or implied and the others believe it, then it is so.

 

 

No one is talking about the catch 22 here. If he had the gun and her dad or someone felt threatened by the weapon and tried to disarm him he could use the stand your ground defense when it really would have been the other person who was feeling threatened and standing their ground. The gun would win out over the fists in the short term.

This is a guy who is going to do something stupid with a gun again in the near or maybe slightly distant future.  Hopefully he won't kill anyone again, but that is hardly guaranteed.

 

LouieB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...