run_run_run Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Listening to 9/20/03 live (which is A+ so far) and I am wondering why they don't have the YHF transmision durring Poor Places play at the end of resent live versons? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest tandylacker Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 transmision durring resent versons Quote Link to post Share on other sites
zach5277 Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Now-a-days when Wilco plays Poor Places it usually fades into noise which then provides a transition into another song. Perhaps the lack of the YHF transmission is to make that transition a little smoother? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 Conet Project copywrited the transmissions. The reason why folks like you and I are able to purchase the second pressing of the four disc Conet Project is due to a settlement of an undisclosed amount, Wilco --> Conet Project. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
run_run_run Posted September 30, 2006 Author Share Posted September 30, 2006 Now-a-days when Wilco plays Poor Places it usually fades into noise which then provides a transition into another song. Perhaps the lack of the YHF transmission is to make that transition a little smoother?They could do YHF transmission ~> more noise ~> next song (spiders!) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wheelco Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 wilco is returning to being an organic folk groop and is discontinuing noise and hiss Quote Link to post Share on other sites
run_run_run Posted September 30, 2006 Author Share Posted September 30, 2006 wilco is returning to being an organic folk groop and is discontinuing noise and hissThat would be somthing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
froggie Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 hmm, cooledit has hiss and noise reduction functions. maybe i should put a sample of these transitions in and see what happens? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gobias Industries Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 conet project copyrighted the transmissions, so they can't play them anymore. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
aricandover Posted September 30, 2006 Share Posted September 30, 2006 conet project copyrighted the transmissions, so they can't play them anymore. they've played them since the lawsuit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
run_run_run Posted October 1, 2006 Author Share Posted October 1, 2006 they've played them since the lawsuit.Right and all the details of the settlement are not public. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
luke Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 i had no idea "yankee-hotel-foxtrot" was being said at the end of that song till I listened to/attended a few 2003 shows. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrRain422 Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 They also aren't promoting YHF anymore. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pickleboiler Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 I can't belive conet can copyright something that was transmitted all over the fucking world and not by them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
run_run_run Posted October 1, 2006 Author Share Posted October 1, 2006 They also aren't promoting YHF anymore.True, but if you go with that logic they sould never play YHF tunes again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrRain422 Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 True, but if you go with that logic they sould never play YHF tunes again. Not really. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Artifex Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 I can't belive conet can copyright something that was transmitted all over the fucking world and not by them. But the recording was done by them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jhc Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 But the recording was done by them. was it? or just the collection/archiving? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gobias Industries Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 (edited) But the recording was done by them. It's a collection of shortwaves. The shortwaves were created by other people (e.g. government agencies), the Conet Project just pressed "Record" and packaged it. So yes, they recorded it, but not in the typical sense of when someone records an album. Edited October 3, 2006 by poortranslator Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rareair Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 they published the work. makes little difference that it was not in the form of a record. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 (edited) they published the work. makes little difference that it was not in the form of a record. And besides, what nation-state would actually claim responsibility for them? It's kind of a get-not-rich-quick scheme. No one else will claim ownership, so they can. Edited October 3, 2006 by Speed Racer Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jhc Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 It's a collection of shortwaves. The shortwaves were created by other people (e.g. government agencies), the Conet Project just pressed "Record" and packaged it. So yes, they recorded it, but not in the typical sense of when someone records an album. Works produced by the government are in the public domain, no? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
aricandover Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Works produced by the government are in the public domain, no? wilco probably thought the same thing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MunkyKayse Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 It's a collection of shortwaves. The shortwaves were created by other people (e.g. government agencies), the Conet Project just pressed "Record" and packaged it. Conet Project was actually a compilation of recordings made by many, not just the one who collected them. There are four cds worth of recordings with broadcasts from all over the world in different languages, many with just tones and pulses. So person A records a number station of unknown origin five-ten years ago, shares it with person B who places it on CD for sale, person C digs sound and samples recording in a song, person B sues claiming the recording was his originally... B & C settle out of court (What does person A receive from settlement? ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.