Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The guy won a frikkin' PULITZER for crying out loud.

His reviews are consistently entertaining reading.

He put out a book with this title:

ebert2.jpg

 

Plus, he did Oprah and talks about it freely.

 

Go Roger!!!

 

So, let's talk about Rog in here. Because he's cool.

:worship

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roger Ebert and Oprah Winfrey bumped uglies?

 

He must have a thing for black women since he is married to one.

I like the guy, and since so many threads featuring celebrities as headers have to do with death, this one gave me a mini-heart attack.

Sadlly Roger has been on death's door for several years. I thought the same thing. It is actually a miricle he is still around and writing.

 

LouieB

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Runaway Jim

I like Ebert and have always valued his reviews. I always enjoyed him on At the Movies with Siskel/Roeper. His reviews are always well written and entertaining, and he tends to be the critic I trust most. However, since he returned from his illness, he hands out 4 star reviews to just about anything. He's just so happy to be alive that he'll give 4 stars to anything that moves.

 

Apparently he'll also bang anything that moves???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the guy, and since so many threads featuring celebrities as headers have to do with death, this one gave me a mini-heart attack.

 

I had the same reaction. I was really dreading reading this thread given his recent health issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer

Siskel & Ebert really knew which scenes to pick from a movie to highlight them the best. We always watched S&E during dinner on Saturday nights, and though I didn't care much for it in the beginning, they did grow on me (especially once I was old enough to see most of the movies). Ebert, more than Siskel (never did watch the Roeper years) was really able to hand out a scathing review.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always liked Roger. I often don't agree with his reviews but I always admire his passion for film. It's obvious that the guy is a true fan of movies, not just someone doing it because they get paid to. My favorite books of his are the collection of essays "Greatest Movies" & "Greatest Movies II" that delve into his favorite movies of all-time. The guy may have given great reviews to some shitty movies over the years, but when it comes to his choices for these books they're pretty impeccable for the most part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the man that wrote the immortal lines "This is my groovy happening, and it freaks me out" (Beyond the valley of the dolls). That alone makes him a legend, but the Oprah thing, that puts him on another level.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you guys read his blog? Its seriously some of the consistently best writing on the internet, bar none. For example:

 

His reminisces about food

 

Admitting his alcoholism, and experiences in AA (one of the most powerful columns I've ever read)

 

His scathing, not so subtle flaming of Ben Lyons

 

Some hilarious, sobering, and beautifully written shit and you're not likely to hear it from a more genuine guy. I think the loss of his speech has given him a renewed voice in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with what Runaway Jim wrote. It even drove one of his most avid fans apeshit when he gave a glowing review to Nicolas Cage's Knowing. Ebert, I think, even put it on his Top Ten List of 2009. I loved the movie, since it challenged our ideas of what an alien or angel would be. (i've said too much. :pirate )

 

Furthermore, my 1st gig as a PA on Daddy's Girl,which became known as The Game Plan, I worked with someone who looked exactly like him. It was uncanny. No one believed me. There was no photographic evidence, until Facebook came along. People laughed and were like "WOW?!" It's so odd the resemblance. He looks like an older Roger Ebert but in a younger body. Since of course Ebert was heavy when he 1st came around.

 

LukeEbert.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you guys read his blog? Its seriously some of the consistently best writing on the internet, bar none. For example:

 

His reminisces about food

 

Admitting his alcoholism, and experiences in AA (one of the most powerful columns I've ever read)

 

His scathing, not so subtle flaming of Ben Lyons

 

Some hilarious, sobering, and beautifully written shit and you're not likely to hear it from a more genuine guy. I think the loss of his speech has given him a renewed voice in writing.

He's a pretty great twitterer, too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

I consistently read his blog, also because he also wittily responds to some of the comments made on the articles. He often succeeds in completely refuting the arguments in a thousand word rant with just one sentence.

 

I really like most of his reviews though he gets caught up on one negative aspect often times. A recent review of his I really liked was the one of "The Virgin Suicides".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you guys read his blog? Its seriously some of the consistently best writing on the internet, bar none. For example:

 

His reminisces about food

 

This was reprinted in the Sun-Times last week and it is a fucking great read. One of the best essays on anything that I have read, ever. And one more reason to love Roge.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

The part where he's talking about Gene...just damn.

One of my favorite pieces by Ebert was written last February, ten years after Gene's death. It's a beautiful, perceptive, artful piece of prose writing.

 

That's the thing about Ebert: He's known as a skilled critic, yes, but his real secret is that he's a skilled writer, period. I discovered Ebert as a teenager; one of the first "movie books" I ever bought was his 1988 collection of reviews. Since then, I've moved on to other, more scholarly critics, but I remain amazed at his unparalleled ability to discuss sophisticated cinematic topics in a way that the average newspaper reader can immediately grasp. He knows his stuff, but he also knows his audience. Mostly, though, I have remained loyal to Ebert because he has such a strong voice on the page. Even when I disagree with his judgment--which happens frequently--I always enjoy reading his words, because he has such a way with them.

 

I haven't read the Esquire piece yet, but I'm looking forward to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the link to the article, sureshot. i've only read about half of it so far.

 

the first time i remeber watching "sneak previews" was when siskel and ebert reviewed "my dinner with andre."

the formative years, to be sure. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...