Jump to content

Rock is the new jazz. Sorry, rock.


Recommended Posts

So says one PopMatters writer who gets Wilco in the mix.

 

"Hardly anyone is listening to rock these days. Sure, dinosaurs like the Rolling Stones remain huge draws on the road—baby boomer fans can afford the $150 ticket price to relive the old days. But the future, measured by radio play and music sold and people under the age of 30 caring about a new album by Bruce Springsteen or Wilco or The Hold Steady—the future points away from 'rock'."

 

"Get ready, Rock. The premium in your art will shift from joy and movement to craft and a meticulous trickiness. Wilco, Radiohead, Mutemath, even The Darkness point the way. These bands can really play. Goodness, Wilco even brought in an avant-garde jazz guitarist, Nels Cline, to give them more credibility as a tricky gang of sound-experimentalists. Simple country-rock songs with good lyrics were not enough for Jeff Tweedy and friends. And so will you go, Rock."

 

Here's the full story: http://www.popmatter...azz.-sorry-rock.

 

*Admins: didn't know if this should be here since there is mention of Wilco, or if it should be in Someone Else's Song to address a broader group of artists/genres...

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few years ago I'd only listen to jazz. Dave Brubeck, Oscar Peterson, Kenny Drew, Niels-Henning Ørsted Pedersen, Esbjorn Svensson Trio, Brad Mehldau...lately it's been just R.E.M., Minus 5, Wilco, Robyn Hitchcock, Jakob Dylan... I've abandoned the jazz CDs and don't know if this should be reason for concern :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few years ago I'd only listen to jazz. Dave Brubeck, Oscar Peterson, Kenny Drew, Niels-Henning Ørsted Pedersen, Esbjorn Svensson Trio, Brad Mehldau...lately it's been just R.E.M., Minus 5, Wilco, Robyn Hitchcock, Jakob Dylan... I've abandoned the jazz CDs and don't know if this should be reason for concern :)

 

I'm in the same boat. I was immersed in jazz for a few years. I probably haven't spun a whole jazz record in three years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's odd to me that the popmatters article made no mention of Arcade Fire. To me, they continue to demand people's attention with what can only be called rock.

 

I think the article's quite an overreaction. Rock may be in a transitional period, but it's not going away. Rock is arguably the most flexible of genres, itself a hybrid of the most organically emotive genres: country, folk & blues.

 

I think Wilco & Radiohead are both, in different ways, groping around a bit these days to find a new, more compelling, iteration of rock. They are the standard-bearers in my opinion. Radiohead of the brit rock tradition, Wilco of the American folk rock tradition (plus punk). But again, I think you have to respect Arcade Fire as a worthy and relevant upholder of all things rock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Wilco even brought in an avant-garde jazz guitarist, Nels Cline, to give them more credibility as a tricky gang of sound-experimentalists."

 

100% wrong.

 

Anyway, I guess this writer didn't hear that Van Halen is back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Wilco even brought in an avant-garde jazz guitarist, Nels Cline, to give them more credibility as a tricky gang of sound-experimentalists."

 

100% wrong.

 

Wow - that is pretty bad and yes, wrong. Actually, it's a pretty much a put down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me that "rock music" festivals are becoming more popular. I personally don't really like the festival experience, but from the different message boards I peruse regularly, people get really exicted for festivals like Forecastle, Bonaroo, Hangout, etc etc. and these things seem to sell out pretty regularly or at least get really solid turn outs and the people who go seem to be more into "joy and movement" than "craft and meticulous trickiness".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol @ those idiots who think chart succes is really the main indicator of longevity. Nirvana is usually considered as the last rock band that had both critical acclaim and huge commercial succes and guess what? It got outsold by a gazillion copies by Shania Twain, Whitney Houston and the backstreet boys in the 90s.

 

There's always a shocking lack of any historical insight whatsoever in American rock analysis. Annoys me to no end.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nirvana is usually considered as the last rock band that had both critical acclaim and huge commercial succes...

 

is Radiohead not considered a "rock band?"

 

also, there is a very vibrant contemporary jazz scene, it just doesn't get much press because it isn't marketable.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...