Panther

The irony of all ironies regarding these sign holding morons, is that they voted for Bush twice, so in that sense, they themselves share the blame for enabling him to mishandle the economy for eight years. Which is not to say that Clinton and the democrats did not have a hand in fucking things up as well, but Jesus fucking Christ, before blaming all the nations woes on a president that inherited Bush’s incompetence, after only 8 months, take a good look in the mirror before picking up a crayon and putting it to paper.

 

If you voted for Bush, congratulate yourself for helping to fuck up our economy and our standing in the world – if you voted for Bush twice, and think Palin would have made a fine successor, do yourself and the rest of us a huge favor, stay home on election day, and/or shut the fuck up - and don't forget to congratulate yourself on being a two-time or more loser.

Your Mental, how about all the Bush and iraq qar protesters that voted for clinton who dropped bombs on that country througout the 90s same deal . Liberals like to laugh at crazy conservatives just for fun, you know both parties are tied deep into political rhetoric and nothing else supporting either is equally stupid the right wing dosent care if they start a culturual civil war its about politics just like they dont realy care if their is free health care or not why would they care its bnot their money, their against it because of their parties idealogies or fake persona same goes for the dems. One giant party runs your country its called RICH PPL .. stop whining watch more late era geaorge carlin.

p.s no such thing as the n.w.o sorry for spitting all that shitte

Jim Orourkes Fntasy music makes me wanna throw away all my nu-garage uprsingLps that came out this year, but hes only one man so PUNK will rise againg regardless!! Loose Fur should make a record in this vein

"At the same age Dylan was making Christian albums". Yeah, and there are some fine songs on those LPs.

Yeah I love those Lps especiaclly Slow Train Coming Im partial because I love christian mythology and the hole idea of the evil world that we are all blind to. There are some fine songs on THis Lp to, see my point.

Yeah I love those Lps especiaclly Slow Train Coming Im partial because I love christian mythology and the hole idea of the evil world that we are all blind to. There are some fine songs on THis Lp to, see my point.

WERE ALL A BUNCH OF ANTIHEROS , just a bunch of Jeff Tweedys scatered around the world

I don't think that's by a highly respected critic at all, if such things even exist.

 

The amount of typos and grammatical errors is just painful.

cna yuo raed tihs fi yuo cna yuo hvae a starnge mnid to

P.S i dont knwo you but i bet your lame

Wilco The Album

There are two primary ways to disect this record, one is to accept what you hear give into your assumtions

that there is nothing worth digging for. That can work , especially if your a long time Jeff Tweedy fan .

The second falls along the lines of what songwritting is . With Dylans "LOVE AND THEFT" we were given by the "songwriter" himeslf the truth all songs are love and theft , Wilco The Album could have been titled You AnD I

in fact every Jeff Tweedy record could be titled that. All the alcaim that Tweedy recived for political content and voice of a hard times this decade was total bullshit, and im sure he knows it. Go back to YHF and tell me you dont hear 11 Love songs. The fact that the flawless Sky Blue Sky now a Tweedy classic was a shock to anyone was the true shock. The words You and I appear all over this record , yHF was more of a I and You ill admit that. The tunes are cathcy the words are soft? well sort of, I find it to be another cannon of great Tweedy songs , the production dosent favour each song individually but as a collection ot works masterfully.

SONNY FEELING contains the line "she knows nothing of emimniem's suburban gangster flow" and how fitting is that !!

Jeff Tweedy the guitar poet who never got credit for his masterpiece as it was widely belived it be nothing without that master producer, sound familar. (for those of you who didnt get this eminiems work is largely creditied to Dr DRE)That is a fitting comparision and there about the same age aswell parell poets.

In conclsuion at AGE 41 Tweedy and company have made the perfect record for a band thats living its art on the stage yes thats where the true mastery has taken place this decade, do you like summerteeth better than Wilco The Album? well i bet youd like Wilco the band 2009 live!! better than wilco the band 1999, maybe not. personally Id like to see them become a "studio" band again but hey its their careers. P.S KEEP IN MIND AT THIS POINT OF DYLANS CAREER HE WAS MAKING CHRISTIAN ALBUMS.

p.s ive spent my time away fighting world goverment, good news i won there will be no "new world order" in your lifetime.

This is a digital suicide, ive made to many mistakes and need a fresh start.... my life here as Panther is over, no more conspiracy theories no more hard to understand reviews none of it good bye and good luck maybe I'll be born again as someone new. with a new wilco lp this seems perfect its over goodbye and goodluck

SBS is officialy a classic .. people like me were right all along. not listening to this till i buy it

Do chemtrails next!

Yea chemtrails are weird because there is no sceincetific evidence for the claims but at the same time the sceintific explanation for the phenomenonn dosent make sense either.

Which is that its is simply the wind blowing the contrails around to make it seem like purposful trails. My neighbourhood gets them all the time they make strange clouds and when there is allot of them it looks super weird especially when there low. Why do some contrails disapear in in 4 seconds and some last a whole day?

Using a free translation website, I tried my darnedest to make out what you were saying

Aren

Yeah me too. I am sure I listened to it at some point, but I can't remember any of the songs on it. I loved Oh, Inverted World and Chutes Too Narrow, but it's been awhile since I've felt compelled to listen to them again.

 

--Mike.

The Shins are soo 03 ... I will listen to the new record and they had there relevence at one point but there as relevent as Death Cab these days

So...because the title of the article says that the government is taking ownership of all the water in the nation, that means that the government is actually taking control of all the water in the nation?

 

Scuse me, I'm up against the deadline for my latest article, "Caliber66 won the Megamillions drawing on 5/8/09".

No , no, no, no, no . I dont know what most of you are talking about but make your own opinions stop trying to disect mine to your own warped views.

My point by refering to the title again was to point out what the article is saying. The person writing the article has a viewpoint clearly and they are taking a synical look

at this bill that supossedly has to do with keeping water clean. Now if you feel thats all their is to it stae that. Do i agree with the article well sorta but Im not sure, I dont remeber saying once in this thread gather round my children!! Im not preaching shit, so stop acting like its totally insane to have a negative reaction to these types of laws, and yes this dose mean that the water is goverment owned if the bill passes, why dont you spend time being hard on senate bills finindg out what they mean instead of being hard on me,

I think you would all find out that I am a very reasnable yet naive person who wants to learn.. so If you spent your time explaining why you think my view is so crazy I might actually agree with you.

Im sure none of you have a problem with the patriot act either, I mean who is hurt by protectingn the nation, brave comment eh

Im sorry I sould probably be posting about the president ordering burgers or other important stuff like how his dog is doing

I think its very unlikly that a world goverment will form within the next 20 years .... but when there are only 7 or so countries running the world who have no viable enemies whats the diffrence? Nation states will play their role in the new world order in the same vein as a part time employees plays a role in wal mart. The truth is their is no evil empire out there who oppssses america who opposses freedom, it is America and Canada and The U.K etc etc who are that evil empire who opress billions around the world. It is here today,

you might not personally feel it just like you dont personally feel the recession if your the one with the job. I am not one who condems and says "change" the world!!!! no,no,no you cant change the world thats ridiculous to quote george carlin "where would you start?" just free your mind change yourself, help me and help others .

My point simply is that I can't follow the logic of your argument (especially when you twice have said that it's "brave" to be on the side of clean water) to determine whether you have an actual point that's worth considering, or whether you're just a dude who likes to throw out conspiracy theories and hates spellcheckers.

My point was that when someone asks "who is hurt by clean water?" instead of dignifing that with a serious response I choose to laugh and say soemthing stupid.

because that is a stupid thing to say, so when I said its brave to be on the side of clean water what I mean is that has nothing to do with the argument, who would possibly be against clean water. I think if you start at the beggining of this forum my point an the points of others come across clearly but hey make your own point.

so i will repat myself once more..............

My point being that with all the enviormental damage western goverments have done over the last century its laugable to think that they have our intrests

or that they are on the side of the enviorment. The enviorment has become a political tool by the likes of Al Gore and many others fucking prince charles is now preaching to the peaseansts about the enviorment what a laugh, Im not saying there isnt a debate on this paticular issue all I did was post the article I didnt write it but my opinion is that this is about control and nothing more, not like I have a better idea they are probably right for doing this Im just pointing out where this world is headed its intresting atleast.

Nobobdy told me there would be days like these, strange days indeeeed

didn't you say that already? maybe if i ask my question again it will add to the dejavou (or however the hell you spell that word) of this thread. who does clean water hurt?

 

to quote you "if the law is passed even on the basis of clean water it still means the goverment owns the water which has never happened before in modern history" exactly HOW does that mean the government (with an n) owns the water? i think that's the point i'm getting at, but you'll never see it or answer the question because you don't have an answer. you instead deflect, point out flaws in others, and repeat yourself.

 

and really, you don't bring forth a view that lingers in anyone's mind and i don't find you to be very provocative either. fact skewing or ignoring maybe, but yeah, there's nothing too deep about conspiracy theories in my humble opinion.

Okay lets take this slowly ..... first off did you read the article? if you didnt the title was New Law Gives Goverment Ownership Of All Water In Nation.

Thats the title not my title, okay. you can find the article on whatdoseitallmean.org or on the first page of this forum,

According to these reports, the top elite military-political and corporate classes currently ruling the United States ordered the introduction into the US Senate this past week on April 2nd a new law called the Clean Water Restoration Act (S.787 IS) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) by, and quoting directly from this new law:

(1) by striking `navigable waters of the United States' each place it appears and inserting `waters of the United States';

(2) in section 304(l)(1) by striking `NAVIGABLE WATERS' in the heading and inserting `WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES'; and

(3) by striking `navigable waters' each place it appears and inserting `waters of the United States'

and then adding:

(25) WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES- The term `waters of the United States' means all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds, and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters, or activities affecting these waters, are subject to the legislative power of Congress under the Constitution.'.

That is the part of the article that explains the change in the law. Now again its not my article and as someone pointed out before its from a russian source.

"and really, you don't bring forth a view that lingers in anyone's mind and i don't find you to be very provocative either. fact skewing or ignoring maybe, but yeah, there's nothing too deep about conspiracy theories in my humble opinion."

well I disagree I think many people distrust their government and their media even if they dont publicly express it but hey thats me. Your last sentence dose not make sense saying there is nothing to deep about conspircay theories, which theories? This is a matter of reality , this is a new developement on the state of american and unfortunetly canadian waters, and as Ive said before their is definetly a debate to be had I never said what the truth of the matter is because your right I dont have the answers.

Isnt this all Ironic , I think if everyone calmed down youd understand me a little better instead I am treated like a crazy ideology warrior

that must be silenced by superior liberal thinking, Is you main point that this entire law change is not even worth mentoning? I havent been hard or firm on anything in this thread I dont claim to know whats truly going on I just have my opinions.

who cares????????

(hey, copy & paste works for me, too!)

yeah thats true but now the question turns around, if your tyring to make a point your not doing a very good job

So do you think laws that refer to "citizens of the United States" are an attempt to claim governmental ownership of all citizens?

The goverment dose claim ownership over all citizens thats why when you get bank staements goverment statements or go to jail its your name in all capital letters,

that is the you that the goverment owns.

If you're trying to make a point here, you're not doing a very good job of it.

My point being that with all the enviormental damage western goverments have done over the last century its laugable to think that they have our intrests

or that they are on the side of the enviorment. The enviorment has become a political tool by the likes of Al Gore and many others fucking prince charles is now preaching to the peaseansts about the enviorment what a laugh, Im not saying there isnt a debate on this paticular issue all I did was post the article I didnt write it but my opinion is that this is about control and nothing more, not like I have a better idea they are probably right for doing this Im just pointing out where this world is headed its intresting atleast.

Nobobdy told me there would be days like these, strange days indeeeed

Before I rest my head at night, I close my eyes up tight, until my face is all like, scrunched up, and I pray PANTHER, I fucking pray to a god I don

yeah, Panther, still waiting for that solid argument on how clean water=the government owning the water. and an answer to the question about who clean water hurts.

 

i also find it kind of sad that you think brain damage in children who regularly drank tap water in the capital of this country, a major city, is hilarious.

what are you talking about ? when did I say that clean water equals the goverment owning the water, if the law is passed even on the basis of clean water it still means the goverment owns the water which has never happened before in modern history. Who clean waster hurts again I will simply laugh and say you must be brave to be on the side of clean water. I think we should also have more carbon tax laws because of course it is us the people who are to blame for enviormental damage(now thats sarcasm)

50 billioon is allot of money , my first guesse is that they will spend 10 billion on building a kickass spaceship that some hicks in texas will spot thinking its aliens.

It keeps the crazies crazy and its a fun toy for the military to play with. ARent they tired of playing with their toys in the sand yet, time for some star wars!!

I

Mind control, obviously.

My point being that with all the enviormental damage western goverments have done over the last century its laugable to think that they have our intrests

or that they are on the side of the enviorment. The enviorment has become a political tool by the likes of Al Gore and many others fucking prince charles is now preaching to the peaseansts about the enviorment what a laugh, Im not saying there isnt a debate on this paticular issue all I did was post the article I didnt write it but my opinion is that this is about control and nothing more, not like I have a better idea they are probably right for doing this Im just pointing out where this world is headed its intresting atleast.

Nobobdy told me there would be days like these, strange days indeeeed

No. because clean water has an impact on entire ecosystems, people's health, the health of unborn babies, animals, plants...the list could go on and on. I am just never going to see the connection or leap of how having a law to keep pig farms from dumping their waste into a neighboring wetland is the U.S. government trying to own the water. Can you give one solid argument on how having clean water is a motivation of limiting water from the American people? Just one? I guess under your logic the U.S. government already owns the air with the Clean Air Act.

 

Now the article that was posted a while ago about the state that is trying to ban rain barrels because people are collecting water that should end up in streams that are irrigated onto farms and are therefore tealing water, that is government trying to own the water.

 

Living in a major city that has severe lead, pharmaceutical, and god knows what other contamination in its drinking water, the cleaner our water can be the better. there is a court case pending here because 2 little boys drank DC tap water a few years ago and now have serious developmental disabilities, all the while the head of the water treatment authority knew the lead levels were toxic for children. there is an ongoing investigation to figure out how many other children were affected by the water. WHO exactly is clean water going to hurt. ???

 

not everything is a conspiracy.

Thats a hillarious argument your on the side of clean water wow how brave of you, let me ask you this why is their floride in the water

I've never heard of this band but this review is so intriguing. Who is having the discussion in your review?

Panther is an invention I used to post on this forum as mathew so ive actually been on this board since 06 Ive been tthinking about going back to my old name.

So that is who the conversation is between.