Jump to content

Panther

Member
  • Content Count

    694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Panther

  1. Three things:

     

    1 - I don't care at all if we go to one world currency.

    2 - Secret societies do exist. I never said they didn't. I said that the kind of shit happening now doesn't necessarily indicate any NWO. It indicates rich folks are taking advantage of people and poor folks are sucking it up. Just like old times.

    3 - Learn to form a sentence. This is an important business skill that will help you find success in the inevitable new world order.

     

    1. You definetly forsure defnitly yup!! uh hu SHOULD!!!

    2. Rich folks taking advantage of poor folks, so there like conspiring against the poor to rule, yeah I agree and at this point the world is so centralized that their end goal is in sight!!

    3. thats true people will be succesful in the new world order i cant see a complete slave society , I think they might have to reduce the worlds population though.

    I dont have to worry though I plan to Die in the next revolution.

     

     

    Okay for once I am speaking from the heart we all have to look more seriously at the world. The conspiracy is not something hidden it is out in the open it is the gears of the machine, it is everyday life. the world is run by monsters , what ever happened to the sixities weve become so dissentized to ourselves.

     

    Bob Dylan was right you cant change the world I dont know if we will all be better off by destroying this society to build something new I dont think we have it in us to throw out our T.vs its a scary thought. The denial is rampant and I hate my fuckin job and my fuckin boss, he is the new world order, so destiny will be sure , i dont know what to say.

    But dont tell me that the words New World Order dont mean anything why the fuck then do you retards think gordon brown used it like 8 times in a speech why did geogre bush senior say it september 11 1991 and why did Bill Clinton say in reference to geore bush that we need a New World Order WTFFFFFFF

    do you have any idea how many quotes of powerful people calling for world goverment have been posted on this fuckin forum , by me, shit.

    Is it all a fucking joke? I feel insane when I read something post it and people tell me it aint there .

     

    There can not be any denial anylonger that world goverment is something that atleast Dvaid Rockerfella wants no need to say anything else.

    Now if you think world goverment or global curency is a good thinng fine make you argument, retatrds.

     

     

    I do have an alternative theory though, that good ol neon might agree with I call it the conspiracy conspiracy.

    I could post something legeit later but for now Il say this , maybe these powerfull people say this stuff to conjure up discussion.

    maybe they say New WORLD order to distract. They know the masses are retards, but there are always a select few who seek the truth maybe all this world goverment stuff is a conspircay to keep the litttle investigators of the Free World busy, keep them guessing, keep them following the wrong trail.

     

    I doubt it.

     

     

    PEACE OUT , I WILL NEVER POST ABOPUT THE NEW WORLD ORDER AGAIN, Im sorry

  2. I was hoping someone would respond to my dragon comment , dosent anyone else find it cool that chinese culture

    knew about dinasours I mean they must have or that is one crazy coincedence.

     

    Anyways I hope that most of you realize that perception is not reality and if there ar credible articles about something you should at least pay it some mind.

    The truth is that we are screwed either way we have no clue as to what or who we are, we got soome learning to do.

     

    Oh one more thing I find it amazing that these arguments always shift you know? like last year I could have said some conspiracy theories about global curency and Im sure many of you would have just insulted me said its pure fantasy, but when there is definet proof that its a real possiblity the argument is that its not so bad.

     

    we gotta take a poll heere sometime soon, who is in favor of global curency, i dunt know really this shit scares me, not these banking monsters but you people.

    I mean when it all comes to fruition I can clrealy see how the deception is gonna wrk how we will all fall for it, Obama is like a good start to see what well buy.

  3. How amazing was that presidential confrence, when the fox news reporter asked about china proposing wordl curency, brilliant, Obama damnced around (as puppets do) ignored the question and instead talked about how strong the dollar is which is ofcourse total B.S, luckly for my entertainment the reporter after about a minute of political rambling from Mr. Obama (he aint my president) asked again so uhhhhhhh are you in favor of global curency and Obama said simple , no. I changed the channel to BBC and watched the reporters discuss how China and russia have been calling for a new global monetary system anmd it was intresting.

     

    But how about this folks.looks like Bamas fellow washington outsider firend Geithner is a bit two faced wow no way, shocked

    Geithner: U.S.

  4. Obviously, but it doesn't point to some sort of New World Order of secret society of elites. It points to business as usual for the rich, business as usual for the poor.

     

    You must be insane, first of all secret societies exist and have existed through out every empire including your beloved moma America,

    the information on the New World Order is staggering the world bank is now discussing one world currecny like in reality, cool huh,

     

    "there is no elite, there is no elite, there is no elie, there is no elite" wow its almost true now

     

    Buissness as usual for the rich? wait what isnt that the elite? wait what.

     

    see the truth is we all agree, the world is run by monsters its monopilized and caged one day to be free, the diffrence is your in that muck of folks who calls themselves progressive liberals so you cant allow your views to be associated with the "conspiracy" version of history. You play that game, but wait now Im playing that game to im the conspiracy theorist , right? nope Im not. I dont defend conspiracis that I think are wrong I dont defend conspiracy reaserchers who I think are crazy, Im sane that way.

     

    YOU on the other hand(not literaly you but your ilk) defend the corrupt liberals you call bill clinton a hero Obama is Tshirt worthy, a liberal will defend a corrupt liberal any day when argfuing with a conservative(just watch cnn), thats why I knew all my life that those are the truly insane.

     

    P.S much love Viachciago I agree with that Nekocase comment

  5. This video has already been posted and discussed. Is it the best Obama video you've never seen?

     

    oh i havnt been around here for a while so i didnt no that. Um i dont know what you mean by the best Obama video that Ive seen?

    When I said its not that good Im just refering to Alex Jones the director, ive seen a few of his previous films and they all put things together and he gives a perspective that ya aint gona hear on the TV, but its ruff around the edges and he tends to yell and say outrageous things its like hes playing the character of what someone who actually belives this stuff should be, angry!!!!! I didnt get angry watching this Obama is a clown no shock to my system.

     

    But yea I dont know what you meant, Baracks only been in office a short while Im not aware of any other documentries yet.

  6. Post of the year.

     

    thats fine, i dont disagree but they are not my theories, I am not saying listen to me believe me , you must admit that for many reason people refuse to acknowledge the weight behind certain conpiracy theories because well many reasons time (who has time to really research anyones claims or documents) and mostly apaththy. Trust me Im not some speaker for a movement nor am I a death professor, and still the simple truth is that I would like to here what intelligent people such as your selves have to say about such things documented things things important credible people say. so fuck my NWO theories sure but how does ignoring these documents quotations or theories change my life one bit ? will it help me get a job? will it stop globilization? will it stop the next american war? no but it will make me less aware it will make me ignorant to who really runs things.

     

    you sir are clearly older than I , you have a very diffrent life from mine , it is obvious that you agree with me when I said " you know this stuff" you know what the system is.

    but alot of people allot of people my age don't and a disscussion is not going to hurt anyone. Really I get it , i get how this shit can be well anoying, how I probably seem like everyother "nutjob" as it has been said, i have to strictly disagreee on the simple basis of logic.

     

    it is very obvious to me that world goverment of some form is a viable plan in the eyes of some of the "controller" or " them" so I think it is worth discussing.

    I mean do I expect tthat some hypathetical world goverment is going to be openly called the new world order and the zombie people will go along with it, no not exactly.

    By my logic I suppose Im a conspiracy theorist by your logic your a coincedence theorist, although it seems like you dont even let teh coincedences register.

     

    Ill finish by saying this do you suppose that the new world order is something that politicians and various other people say to simply get people like me to post this shit and scare the rest of you I mean maybe tahts possible and maybe I am doing more bad than good but I dont here anyone offering a theory like that all i HEAR IS SHUT UP, WELL NO THANK YOU.

     

    P.S

     

    DONT TRUST ANYONE OVER 30 YOUR ALL NUTS.

  7. Even if this is all true (meaning, all that stuff up there I didn't read), what fucking difference would it make in my life if I knew it?

     

     

    You do know all that stuff up their, global domination war political lies its common sense stuff.

    This past election there were probably a thousand pages about nonesense political hype , if were all so intrested in politics shouldnt we be intrested in what it really means.

    Its true that with many questions not unlike the god question you are left feeling well their is nothing I can do, well try harder open your mind.

     

    actualy try this go to the CFRs offiical website and type New World Order into the search engine. if its real its real.

     

    P.S i was trying hard to be polite with my response in reality I cant fathom your ignorance is bliss policy.

  8. OK so the trilateral commission is aiming for a new world order, so do they have the ability to defeat the illuminatti? The vast right wing conspiracy? The priory of scion? The zionist conspiracy? Islamic jihadist movement? All these plans for world domination have my head spinning.

     

    what the hell is the illuminati? as far as I know the illuminati is a culmination of all of these power weilding folks its like a symbol ya know.

     

    All these plans for world domination have my head spinning.

     

    same here, but hey were here arent we this is our world isn't it can't ignore the bad news , well i guesse you can

  9. "The next century can be and should be the humanistic century...we stand at the dawn of a new age...a secular society on a planetary scale....As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature not deity...we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds....Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government....The true revolution is occurring."

     

    Hey, that sounds like an ok idea to me!

  10. http://www.threeworldwars.com/new-world-order.htm

    http://www.threeworldwars.com/nwo-timeline1.htm

     

     

     

    The New World Order Timeline

     

    What Were the Important Dates in the New World Order Timeline?

    J. Edgar Hoover, ex-FBI director on the New World Order conspiracy: "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."

     

    George H.W. Bush's comment: "if the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts."

     

    Significant Dates in the Creation of the New World Order

    Perhaps the best way to relate a brief history of the New World Order, would be to use the words of those who have been striving to make it real throughout the ages. You will be amazed at how far back this grand plan has extended, and how many similarities there are in early Century 21 compared to the 1990's, with two Presidents from the Bush family in power.

     

    1910-1929 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 - Present

     

     

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     

    1912 -- Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator in which he promotes "socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx."

     

    1913 -- The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a reserve) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyll Island, Georgia by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This transferred the power to create money from the American government to a private group of bankers. It is probably the largest generator of debt in the world.

     

    July 28, 1914 -- World War I is triggered by the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand of Austria.

     

    May 27, 1916 -- President Woodrow Wilson proposes at the League of Nations in a speech before the League to Enforce Peace, a world needed to prevent the recurrence of a similar war was a world government.

     

    November 11, 1918 -- The end of World War I, after the signing of the Armistice at the 11th hour on the 11th day of the 11th month.

     

    May 30, 1919 -- Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes. Two years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

     

    December 15, 1922 -- The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states:

     

    "Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states until some kind of international system is created...The real problem today is that of the world government."

     

    1928 -- The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H.G. Wells is published. A former Fabian Socialist, Wells writes:

     

    "The political world of the into a Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments... The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York... The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed... It will be a world religion."

     

    Top of Page

     

     

     

    1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970

     

    1931 -- Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught:

     

    "One day we shall start to spread the most theatrical peace movement the world has ever seen. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent...will fall into the trap offered by the possibility of making new friends. Our day will come in 30 years or so... The bourgeoisie must be lulled into a false sense of security.

     

     

    1932 -- New books are published urging New World Order:

     

    Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S.

     

    The New World Order by F.S. Marvin, describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order. Marvin says, "nationality must rank below the claims of mankind as a whole."

     

    Dare the School Build a New Social Order? is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that:

    "...the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the most of their conquest" in order to "influence the social attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation...The growth of science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of social economy."

     

    Plan for Peace by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all "dysgenic stocks" including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.

     

    1933 -- The first Humanist Manifesto is published. Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and "a socialized and cooperative economic order."

     

    Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930: "Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?

     

    1933 -- The Shape of Things to Come by H.G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing lack of public safety in "criminally infected" areas. The plan for the "Modern World-State" would succeed on its third attempt (about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq.

     

    The book also states, "Although world government had been plainly coming for some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition prepared anywhere."

     

    1934 -- The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase "points of light" in connection with a "New Group of World Servers" and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of "the organizing of the men and women...group work of a new order...[with] progress defined by service...the world of the Brotherhood...the Forces of Light...[and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world order must be built."

     

    The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N. summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey's writings on the subject.

     

    October 28, 1939 -- In an address by John Foster Dulles, later U.S. Secretary of State, he proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.

     

    1939 -- New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist one-world state"' or "new world order" comprised of "socialist democracies." He advocates "universal conscription for service" and declares that "nationalist individualism...is the world's disease." He continues:

     

    "The manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process." He proposes that this be accomplished through "universal law" and propaganda (or education)."

     

    Top of Page

     

     

     

    1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970

     

    1940 -- The New World Order is published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and contains a select list of references on regional and world federation, together with some special plans for world order after the war.

     

    December 12, 1940 -- In The Congressional Record an article entitled A New World Order John G. Alexander calls for a world federation.

     

    September 11, 1941 -- Construction officially began at the Pentagon. 60 years later to the day, the Pentagon was to be attacked on the fateful September 11, 2001.

     

    1942 -- The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes Post War Worlds by P.E. Corbett:

     

    "World government is the ultimate aim...It must be recognized that the law of nations takes precedence over national law...The process will have to be assisted by the deletion of the nationalistic material employed in educational textbooks and its replacement by material explaining the benefits of wiser association."

     

    June 28, 1945 -- President Truman endorses world government in a speech:

     

    "It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States."

     

    October 24, 1945 -- The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favoring creation of a world republic including an international police force.

     

    1946 -- Alger Hiss is elected President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds this office until 1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury and sentenced to prison after a sensational trial and Congressional hearing in which Whittaker Chambers, a former senior editor of Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party cell.

     

    1946 -- The Teacher and World Government by former editor of the NEA Journal (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan is published. He says:

     

    "In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher...can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation...At the very heart of all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession."

     

    1947 -- The American Education Fellowship, formerly the Progressive Education Association, organized by John Dewey, calls for the:

     

    "...establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority..."

     

    October, 1947 -- NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should:

     

    "...teach about the various proposals that have been made for the strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a world citizenship and world government."

     

    1948 -- Walden II by behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner proposes "a perfect society or new and more perfect order" in which children are reared by the State, rather than by their parents and are trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable behavior and characteristics. Skinner's ideas would be widely implemented by educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.

     

    July, 1948 -- Britain's Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR's Foreign Affairs, sees "a New World Order" taking shape:

     

    "How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?...Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape... which may point the way toward the new order... That will be the beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split personality, but held together by a common faith."

     

    1948 -- UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:

     

    "Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable."

     

    1948 -- The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation.

     

    The Constitution provides for a "World Council" along with a "Chamber of Guardians" to enforce world law. Also included is a "Preamble" calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this "Federal Republic of the World" to seize private property for federal use.

     

    Top of Page

     

     

     

    1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970

     

    February 9, 1950 -- The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins:

     

    "Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution."

     

    The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13, 1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley (R-Wisconsin) called it "a consummation devoutly to be wished for" and said, "I understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or change or create, by a separate convention, a world order." Senator Taylor later stated:

     

    "We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves."

     

    April 12, 1952 -- John Foster Dulles, later to become Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, that "treaty laws can override the Constitution." He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.

     

    A Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator John Bricker, would have provided that no treaty could supersede the Constitution, but it fails to pass by one vote.

     

    1954 -- Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis, even to this day. The 2003 meeting took place over the weekend of 15 to 18 May in Versailles, Paris.

     

    1958 -- World Peace through World Law is published, where authors Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate using the U.N. as a governing body for the world, world disarmament, a world police force and legislature.

     

    1959 -- The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International Order. Study Number 7, issued on November 25, advocated:

     

    "...new international order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social and economic change...an international order...including states labeling themselves as 'socialist' [communist]."

     

    1959 -- The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.

     

    1959 -- The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers' Fund. It explains that the U.S.:

     

    "...cannot escape, and indeed should welcome...the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions -- spiritual, economic, political, social."

     

    Top of Page

     

     

     

    1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970

     

    September 9, 1960 -- President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states:

     

    "For it becomes clear that the first step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social."

     

    1961 -- The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which "no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force."

     

    1962 -- New Calls for World Federalism. In a study titled, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states:

     

    "...if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government."

     

    The Future of Federalism by author Nelson Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims that current events compellingly demand a "new world order," as the old order is crumbling, and there is "a new and free order struggling to be born." Rockefeller says there is:

     

    "a fever of nationalism...[but] the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks....These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order... [with] voluntary service...and our dedicated faith in the brotherhood of all mankind....Sooner perhaps than we may realize...there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world."

     

    1963 -- J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee speaks at a symposium sponsored by the Fund for the Republic, a left-wing project of the Ford Foundation:

     

    "The case for government by elites is irrefutable...government by the people is possible but highly improbable."

     

    November 22, 1963 -- President Kennedy is assassinated on November 22, 1963. He was killed according to the occult number signature of eleven [11]. He was killed in the 11th month, on the 22nd day, and on the 33rd parallel. He was also killed in the Masonic Dealey Plaza, the most powerful secret society in the world today to whom the number 11 is extremely important. See cuttingedge for details.

     

    1964 -- Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states:

     

    "...a large part of what we call 'good teaching' is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the students' fixed beliefs."

     

    His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning in Chicago schools. After five years, Chicago students' test scores had plummeted causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of wreckage wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists for overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes among school students.

     

    1964 -- Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes:

     

    "progressive educators as a 'revolutionary cabal' engaged in 'a systematic attempt to undermine society's traditions and beliefs.'"

     

    1967 -- Richard Nixon calls for New World Order. In Asia after Vietnam, in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, Nixon writes of nations' dispositions to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a "new world order."

     

    1968 -- Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor of the NEA Journal publishes The American Citizens Handbook in which he says:

     

    "the coming of the United Nations and the urgent necessity that it evolve into a more comprehensive form of world government places upon the citizens of the United States an increased obligation to make the most of their citizenship which now widens into active world citizenship."

     

    July 26, 1968 -- Nelson Rockefeller pledges support of the New World Order. In an Associated Press report, Rockefeller pledges that, "as President, he would work toward international creation of a new world order."

     

    Top of Page

     

     

     

    1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970

     

    1970 -- Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr. asserts that:

     

    "...the World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline -- world order -- into educational curricula throughout the world...and to concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts into the mass media again on a worldwide level."

     

    1972 -- President Nixon visits China. In his toast to Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member and now President, Richard Nixon, expresses "the hope that each of us has to build a new world order."

     

    May 18, 1972 -- In speaking of the coming of world government, Roy M. Ash, director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that:

     

    "within two decades the institutional framework for a world economic community will be in place...[and] aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to a supernational authority."

     

    September 11, 1972 -- The world was introduced to terrorism at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games. There were 11 Israeli athletes killed. Exactly 29 years after this attack, another more despicable horror occurred - the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

     

    1973 -- The Trilateral Commission is established. Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body and chooses Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to President Carter, as the Commission's first director and invites Jimmy Carter to become a founding member.

     

    1973 -- Humanist Manifesto II is published:

     

    "The next century can be and should be the humanistic century...we stand at the dawn of a new age...a secular society on a planetary scale....As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature not deity...we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds....Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government....The true revolution is occurring."

     

    September 11, 1973 -- Chilean President Salvador Allende is killed in a brutal, violent military coup led by General Augusto Pinochet. Henry Kissinger was strongly implicated in this attack, and if he were to ever stand trial in an International Court, it is likely he would be charged with masterminding this coup and ordering the assassination of Allende.

     

    April, 1974 -- Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner's article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR's Foreign Affairs where he states that:

     

    "the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

     

    1974 -- The World Conference of Religion for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents a report entitled We Can Achieve a New World Order.

     

    The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution: In a report entitled New International Economic Order, the U.N. General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor nations.

     

    1975 -- A study titled, A New World Order, is published by the Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Studies, Princeton University.

     

    1975 -- In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that:

     

    "we must join with others to bring forth a new world order... Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that obligation."

     

    Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:

     

    "It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a 'new world order' that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people."

     

    1975 -- Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in a critique that the goal of the CFR is the "submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all powerful one-world government..."

     

    1975 -- Kissinger on the Couch is published. Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state:

     

    "Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the U.S. government should espouse a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound, discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition..."

     

    1976 -- RIO: Reshaping the International Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.

     

    1977 -- The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for:

     

    "changing Americans' attitudes and institutions" for "complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)" and "for individual entitlement to food, health and education."

     

    [sound like America today?]

     

    1977 -- Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence Shoup and William Minter is published. The book takes a critical look at the Council on Foreign Relations with chapters such as: Shaping a New World Order: The Council's Blueprint for Global Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the 1980's: The Council's Plans for a New World Order.

     

    1977 -- The Trilateral Connection appears in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak, it says:

     

    "For the third time in this century, a group of American schools, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a New World Order..."

     

    1977 -- Leading educator Mortimer Adler publishes Philosopher at Large in which he says:

     

    "...if local civil government is necessary for local civil peace, then world civil government is necessary for world peace."

     

    1979 -- Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies. He writes:

     

    "In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power -- political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."

  11. http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/comme...os-1451416.html

     

    Henry Kissinger: The world must forge a new order or retreat to chaos

     

    Not since JFK has there been such a reservoir of expectations

     

    Tuesday, 20 January 2009

     

     

    As the new US administration prepares to take office amid grave financial and international crises, it may seem counterintuitive to argue that the very unsettled nature of the international system generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy.

     

     

    That opportunity involves a seeming contradiction. On one level, the financial collapse represents a major blow to the standing of the United States. While American political judgments have often proved controversial, the American prescription for a world financial order has generally been unchallenged. Now disillusionment with the United States' management of it is widespread.

     

    At the same time, the magnitude of the debacle makes it impossible for the rest of the world to shelter any longer behind American predominance or American failings. Every country will have to reassess its own contribution to the prevailing crisis. Each will seek to make itself independent, to the greatest possible degree, of the conditions that produced the collapse; at the same time, each will be obliged to face the reality that its dilemmas can be mastered only by common action.

     

    Even the most affluent countries will confront shrinking resources. Each will have to redefine its national priorities. An international order will emerge if a system of compatible priorities comes into being. It will fragment disastrously if the various priorities cannot be reconciled.

     

    The nadir of the international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe. Never have so many transformations occurred at the same time in so many different parts of the world and been made accessible via instantaneous communication. The alternative to a new international order is chaos.

     

    The financial and political crises are, in fact, closely related partly because, during the period of economic exuberance, a gap had opened up between the economic and the political organisation of the world. The economic world has been globalised. Its institutions have a global reach and have operated by maxims that assumed a self-regulating global market. The financial collapse exposed the mirage. It made evident the absence of global institutions to cushion the shock and to reverse the trend. Inevitably, when the affected publics turned to their political institutions, these were driven principally by domestic politics, not considerations of world order. Every major country has attempted to solve its immediate problems essentially on its own and to defer common action to a later, less crisis-driven point.

     

    So-called rescue packages have emerged on a piecemeal national basis, generally by substituting seemingly unlimited governmental credit for the domestic credit that produced the debacle in the first place, so far without achieving more than stemming incipient panic. International order will not come about either in the political or economic field until there emerge general rules toward which countries can orient themselves.

     

    In the end, the political and economic systems can be harmonised in only one of two ways: by creating an international political regulatory system with the same reach as that of the economic world; or by shrinking the economic units to a size manageable by existing political structures, which is likely to lead to a new mercantilism, perhaps of regional units. A new Bretton Woods kind of global agreement is by far the preferable outcome.

     

    America's role in this enterprise will be decisive. Paradoxically, American influence will be great in proportion to the modesty in our conduct; we need to modify the righteousness that has characterised too many American attitudes, especially since the collapse of the Soviet Union. That event and the subsequent period of nearly uninterrupted global growth induced too many to equate world order with the acceptance of American designs, including our domestic preferences. The result was a certain inherent unilateralism

  12. It named several movies the CIA may have had a hand in. It did not mention "The Day the Earth Stood Still." I anxiously await your thoughts on their involvement with "My Giant."

     

     

     

     

    I think he meant that there is a real chance that the current world order (US is the only superpower) will be affected by the rise of Asia (not the band), and that is probably a good thing.

     

    I have no idea how you possibly could get that from what he said. Im not going to ask you for evidence because he didnt go into detail he just said the term but he said it by saying that Obamas grand reception around the world gives the oppurtunity for a new world order also he metinoed the finacial crisis and the crisis in gaza as being potentialy positive for the future. I mean your speculattion is as good as mine but really thats what you got from that inteview? c'mon . I mean I understand that Asia iss a rissing power but thats not what he was talking about. Those idiot reporters didnt ask him to clarify what a new world order is like he would anywayy. okay.

  13. you know the best way to hide the truth is in a web of lies, there are many unfounded conspiracies out there at the core their is something vastly different.

    (there is something very wrong with the world) my only goal was to ask question of people who visit this site as an expieriment of sorts.

    I will return more prepared and will not insult anyones intelligence anylonger,

     

    by the way what do you think henry kissenger meant when he said there is a real possiblity for a new world order? in that clip I posted.

×
×
  • Create New...