BewlayBrother Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 I've struggled with this question for years, and can think of no one more enlightened than the VC community to ease my tortured mind. What's the most important track number? The one where you put the awesomest, most kick-ass, most important, super coolest song on the entire album? In my mind it's a three-way tie between 1, 2, and 4. Some of my favorites (It was difficult, but I stuck with one per band): 1 - Misunderstood, Gimme Shelter, Five Years, I Saw Her Standing There2 - Doctor Rock, Hotel Yorba, Deep Red Bells4 - Youth Decay, The Bleeding Heart Show Quote Link to post Share on other sites
remphish1 Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 I usually think the first track is the most interesting because bands want to get your attention. Once they got your attention then they hit you with a rock song on track 2! Ie...Radiohead the Bends Track 1 Panet Telex, 2 The BendsOK Computer Airbag, then the rock of Paranoid Andriod With Wilco Casino Queen is pretty rocking! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jhh4321 Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 I would say the most important track is somewhere in the middle. It is important to keep attention and an awesome track somewhere in the middle of a record can hold listeners out until the end. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
napoleon Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 2. sweet jane need i say more? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 A friend and I talked a lot about this many years ago, and we agreed that track 2 is the most important track on an album. There are exceptions, of course, but in general, that's the track where we decided the strongest song should reside. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lammycat Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 2. sweet jane need i say more?The first think I thought of was VU, as well. I was thinking "Heroin," though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
quarter23cd Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Theoretically, they should all be good. But, yeah, I'd say that I tend to look at #2 if only for the fact that I always expect the leadoff track to be a "grabber" (or an intro, I suppose), but if track #2 is a letdown it is a bad omen for the rest of the album and hard to recover the momentum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BewlayBrother Posted June 22, 2007 Author Share Posted June 22, 2007 If the consensus for track two holds up, then things are looking good for Icky Thump. Vinyl, of course, throws a whole other wrench into the works... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
a.miller Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 I'm almost done recording my first album (yippee!!) and am having serious thoughts on how to track it. This question perpetually bounces around my head. I kinda feel like the very first track really needs to grab people. period. The second track can be a sort of "setup" for the rest of the album. Or....it could be something totally different. See...perpetual bouncing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MattZ Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 To expand on my thoughts from above: Track 1 is the catchy poppy track to get your attention.Track 2 is the deeper slower groove track to show you that we aren't all sugary or poppy (a la Dear Prudence).Track 3 is the uppercut punch that knocks you out cold. So, I vote for 3. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobfrombob Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Vinyl, of course, throws a whole other wrench into the works...first track on the second side was a huge deal Quote Link to post Share on other sites
quarter23cd Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 #2 theory, as applied to Wilco (my ratings, scale of 1 to 5): Casion Queen: 3Far Far Away: 4She's a Jar: 5Kamera: 3Hell Is Chrome: 4You Are My Face: 11 Conclusion: #2 theory may be flawed, as the albums here with the strongest #2 tracks are not my favorite Wilco albums overall. Interesting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 To expand on my thoughts from above: Track 1 is the catchy poppy track to get your attention.Track 2 is the deeper slower groove track to show you that we aren't all sugary or poppy (a la Dear Prudence).Track 3 is the uppercut punch that knocks you out cold. So, I vote for 3.In my opinion, you have tracks 2 and 3 reversed. 2 should grab you by the short-n-curlies and let you know that you're in for a helluva ride (and that the opener was no fluke); 3 is the slower groove to let your sore pubes heal a bit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lammycat Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Track 1 is the catchy poppy track to get your attention.Track 2 is the deeper slower groove track to show you that we aren't all sugary or poppy (a la Dear Prudence).Track 3 is the uppercut punch that knocks you out cold.The first thing I thought of when I read this was the new Son Volt album, which begins with the soft and lilting "Slow Hearse" and right into the horn-savvy and boppin' "The Picture." Of course, there are always exceptions I suppose. I'll go with a smarmy answer: the weightiest track on an album is the weightiest track on an album, wherever it may lie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BewlayBrother Posted June 22, 2007 Author Share Posted June 22, 2007 first track on the second side was a huge dealEspecially taken in the context of the last track on the first side (see Abbey Road: I Want You -> Here Comes the Sun) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobfrombob Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Track 5 is consistently pretty strong: Pick up the ChangeForget the Flowers/KingpinI Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tongue-tied Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 i also like the albums that open with a bold statement, which wilco has done a few times. Misunderstood, IATTBYH, ALTWYS all aren't poppy tunes, but great signifyers of what the album contains. Grandaddy opened up Sophtware Slump with an 8+ minute track, which is fairly gutsy and one of the best things they did. The second track being catchy though is very very common. I'm listening to London Calling now, I think more bands should sequence their albums that way, were every track is goddamn amazing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dannygutters Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 2. sweet jane need i say more? #2 is also Love In Vain, woot. If the consensus for track two holds up, then things are looking good for Icky Thump. Vinyl, of course, throws a whole other wrench into the works... Intrestingly enought track 2 is less 'rockin' than the track 1 but not as laid back as a sweet jane or love in vain. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
anodyne Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 3 7 and 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MattZ Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 The first thing I thought of when I read this was the new Son Volt album, which begins with the soft and lilting "Slow Hearse" and right into the horn-savvy and boppin' "The Picture." Come on. Slow Hearse doesn't qualify as a song. That's more of an introduction. The Picture is the first song. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Come on. Slow Hearse doesn't qualify as a song. That's more of an introduction. The Picture is the first song. We're talking about tracks, not songs. "Slow Hearse" is the first track. Yes, I'm just being a jerk regarding a technicality. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tongue-tied Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 with few exceptions, i have a strong dislike for introductions. like the horn intro on modest mouse's GNFPWLBN, it's only a few seconds, but completely unnecessary. starting with the guitar of 'World at Large' would have been ten times better. Just listened to Gruff Rhys's Candylion, "This Is Just The Beginning" is likewise useless fluff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Heartbreak Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 The track 2 theory doesn't work too well for the first couple Steely Dan albums: Dirty WorkRazor Boy Great tunes, but there are much better ones on those records. Doesn't work well for some of my favorite FZ albums, either: I Ain't Got No HeartCan't Afford No Shoes I think different artists from different times just have different ideas of tracking. Same thing with the Stones. Who thinks Sway is the best song on Sticky Fingers, or that Love In Vain is the highlight of Let It Bleed? Not me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dannygutters Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 Same thing with the Stones. Who thinks Sway is the best song on Sticky Fingers, or that Love In Vain is the highlight of Let It Bleed? Not me. It is! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.