cryptique Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 "Here, here!" Sorry, but it's "Hear, hear!" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 "Here, here!" Sorry, but it's "Hear, hear!" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ikol Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 their, their Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 Realtor, realitor. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
aricandover Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 I'm shaving off my muff for you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
a.miller Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 there, their, they'reto, too, twoyour, you're Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Left Arm Tan Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 i can't stand people who pronounce the first G in words like "singing" as a hard G. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Kinsley Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 Students use "mines" for "mine" a lot. I realize there are cultural considerations but it's still wrong and requires correction. can I axe you a question? (that gets annoying quickly) spelling bonus: definately Yeah, I've definitely heard both of these in my classroom. (Or should I say definately?) They used to really bug me, but it is a cultural thing. With 'axe,' if the parents say it too, I don't give the kids too rough of a time, though I do try to point it out gently sometimes. Mines on the other hand, I don't let that one slide. No real reason for it. I always ask them, "How many of you are there?" To which they always give me a Here's a fantastic reference! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mrs. Peel Posted October 24, 2007 Author Share Posted October 24, 2007 Thanks for that link! This one always confuses me: Lay/LieYou lay down the book you Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mrs. Peel Posted October 24, 2007 Author Share Posted October 24, 2007 I don't agree with this. Acronyms and Apostrophes One unusual modern use of the apostrophe is in plural acronyms, like Quote Link to post Share on other sites
yermom Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Thanks for that link! This one always confuses me: Lay/LieYou lay down the book you Quote Link to post Share on other sites
insideoutoflove Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 for the longest time i thought it was "play it by year" instead of "play it by ear" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stooka Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Has anyone ever fell on their shoulder and "tore their Rotor Cup"? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lammycat Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Yeah, I've definitely heard both of these in my classroom. (Or should I say definately?) They used to really bug me, but it is a cultural thing. With 'axe,' if the parents say it too, I don't give the kids too rough of a time, though I do try to point it out gently sometimes. Mines on the other hand, I don't let that one slide. No real reason for it. I always ask them, "How many of you are there?" To which they always give me a Here's a fantastic reference!I usually let "axe" slide, too. Though I will tell them it's going to hurt if they axe me something. With "mines" I go through a little spiel once or twice at the beginning of the year when it comes up about the silver and gold mines in Colorado. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I don't agree with this. Acronyms and Apostrophes One unusual modern use of the apostrophe is in plural acronyms, like Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Yeah, apostrophes should basically NEVER be used for plural forms.Agreed. 1950s, not 1950's. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I once saw a classified ad searching for a janitor willing to work the third-shit. Truth in advertising, that one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Left Arm Tan Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Agreed. 1950s, not 1950's. actually, both could be correct. depends on what you are trying to say. if you're referring to the entire decade, then it would be "1950s." like "the 1950s were a great decade" but if you are referring specifically to 1950, then it could be "1950's". like "1950's largest rain fall came on a tuesday" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 actually, both could be correct. depends on what you are trying to say. if you're referring to the entire decade, then it would be "1950s." like "the 1950s were a great decade" but if you are referring specifically to 1950, then it could be "1950's". like "1950's largest rain fall came on a tuesday"We're talking about plurals, not possessives. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Left Arm Tan Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 We're talking about plurals, not possessives. well that's great, but i'm apparently talking about both. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cryptique Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 well that's great, but i'm apparently talking about both.Yes, but your previous post was in direct response to one that was referring solely to plural forms. So what's your point, exactly? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Left Arm Tan Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Yes, but your previous post was in direct response to one that was referring solely to plural forms. So what's your point, exactly? i didn't read the post you are referring to. i'm so sorry. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
a.miller Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 I used to have a hockey coach that always said, "Use your periphreal vision" instead of peripheral. Stupid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marino13 Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 "should of" and "would of" instead of "should have" and "would have." What if they are saying "should've and "would've", wouldn't that be acceptable? supposivelyobliveratedkeep my ear to the grindstonemisuse of "tip my hat/hand"lookin forwards to itdrouth (instead of drought) I hear a ton of these every day. I'm sure I'll think of more. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.