Jump to content

Misspoken or Misunderstood phrases


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Students use "mines" for "mine" a lot. I realize there are cultural considerations but it's still wrong and requires correction.

 

 

can I axe you a question? (that gets annoying quickly)

 

spelling bonus: definately

 

Yeah, I've definitely heard both of these in my classroom. (Or should I say definately?) They used to really bug me, but it is a cultural thing. With 'axe,' if the parents say it too, I don't give the kids too rough of a time, though I do try to point it out gently sometimes.

 

Mines on the other hand, I don't let that one slide. No real reason for it. I always ask them, "How many of you are there?" To which they always give me a :mellow

 

 

Here's a fantastic reference!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I've definitely heard both of these in my classroom. (Or should I say definately?) They used to really bug me, but it is a cultural thing. With 'axe,' if the parents say it too, I don't give the kids too rough of a time, though I do try to point it out gently sometimes.

 

Mines on the other hand, I don't let that one slide. No real reason for it. I always ask them, "How many of you are there?" To which they always give me a :mellow

Here's a fantastic reference!

I usually let "axe" slide, too. Though I will tell them it's going to hurt if they axe me something.

 

With "mines" I go through a little spiel once or twice at the beginning of the year when it comes up about the silver and gold mines in Colorado.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Left Arm Tan
Agreed. 1950s, not 1950's.

 

actually, both could be correct. depends on what you are trying to say.

 

if you're referring to the entire decade, then it would be "1950s." like "the 1950s were a great decade"

 

but if you are referring specifically to 1950, then it could be "1950's". like "1950's largest rain fall came on a tuesday"

Link to post
Share on other sites
actually, both could be correct. depends on what you are trying to say.

 

if you're referring to the entire decade, then it would be "1950s." like "the 1950s were a great decade"

 

but if you are referring specifically to 1950, then it could be "1950's". like "1950's largest rain fall came on a tuesday"

We're talking about plurals, not possessives.

Link to post
Share on other sites
well that's great, but i'm apparently talking about both.

Yes, but your previous post was in direct response to one that was referring solely to plural forms. So what's your point, exactly?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Left Arm Tan
Yes, but your previous post was in direct response to one that was referring solely to plural forms. So what's your point, exactly?

 

i didn't read the post you are referring to. i'm so sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites
"should of" and "would of" instead of "should have" and "would have."

 

What if they are saying "should've and "would've", wouldn't that be acceptable?

 

 

supposively

obliverated

keep my ear to the grindstone

misuse of "tip my hat/hand"

lookin forwards to it

drouth (instead of drought)

 

I hear a ton of these every day. I'm sure I'll think of more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...