NightOfJoy Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Is there any truth to the rumor that Jay Bennet is a silent partner at PF? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lost highway Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 If Pitchfork's opinion is so irrelevant than why is it being anticipated/discussed so much? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
adl6690 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 If Pitchfork's opinion is so irrelevant than why is it being anticipated/discussed so much? Regardless of whether or not Wilco fans see it as relevant, it's just interesting how others see music, that's all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mpolak21 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 That's why bands hire managers like Clell Tickle.  I don't think it sounds like a deravit: Clell Tickle  --Mike Quote Link to post Share on other sites
u2roolz Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Â I used to be a movie snob somewhat. I went through a period where I hated everything that I saw. About 3 years or so ago, I lightened up. I tend to avoid any movie reviews nowadays. I've spent enough time on this planet to know what I should tend to see and what I should run away from (miley cyrus). Â Music is a bit of a different thing altogether. I tend to rely on friends and friends of friends to hear about new bands or older artists I may have missed while bingeing on The Clash. Yeah, some of those friends may be influenced by Pitchfork, Rolling Stone and whatever publication shapes minds. But like a few of you, I get angry when people jump off the bandwagon of any band almost as if it has a 2 year period where it's cool. We tend to live in a very fickle environment where American Idol is one of the top rated shows. (spending some minutes to think of what to say next)... Â I respect you if you like what you like. At least you have some emotional connection with any art than I can respect you. We may disagree on bands, movies, etc but somewhere we're all kind of the same with our own arsenal of such art forms. Â I guess I get upset when people treat things as throw away items. As if that's the way they were brought up, music and movies are no different to them than getting an ice cream sandwhich. Which in some cases that's all that some "bands"and "singers" are to music execs. But if you bring young people up on shit movies and music than you kind of need a big brother or big sister to lead them in a way. While I think Pitchfork may be a somewhat good alternative, it may lead some of these types of folk to band jump by following everything that Pitchfork seems to write about. I don't know. But from working at a movie theater in the past, I can definitely say that 90% of the customers were between 12-20ish. Â KristoforPS Too busy with grad school papers to fully flesh out my thoughts. That's all I got for now.Edit: I should point out that a very close friend of mine turned me onto Wilco in 2002/03. I still don't know where he found or heard about them. Ok, he told me Rolling Stone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mpolak21 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 This review is the epitome of pretty much everything I hate about pitchfork: Jim O'Rourke: Halfway To a Threeway  --Mike Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 This review is the epitome of pretty much everything I hate about pitchfork: Jim O'Rourke: Halfway To a Threeway  --Mike Wow. Just wow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
u2roolz Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 (Maybe Jim actually took my advice.) Â Wow, talk about being delusional. This is one of the first Pitchfork reviews I've read in full. This guy sounds like he seriously thinks that musicians actually take what he says into thought on their next album. He really seems like he thinks he's as powerful on a level as a Fox News or CNN. Â Kristofor Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bleedorange Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 This review is the epitome of pretty much everything I hate about pitchfork: Jim O'Rourke: Halfway To a Threeway  --Mike I don't have a problem with that. In fact, the way the critic illustrates the intense personal connection with O'Rourke actually aids the reader by spelling out where he is coming from, I think. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
adl6690 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 (Maybe Jim actually took my advice.)  Wow, talk about being delusional. This is one of the first Pitchfork reviews I've read in full. This guy sounds like he seriously thinks that musicians actually take what he says into thought on their next album. He really seems like he thinks he's as powerful on a level as a Fox News or CNN.  Kristofor I know. The reviewer actually goes as far to attack Jim on a personal level... it's crazy how little the music is actually talked about. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Central Scrutinizer Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 This review is the epitome of pretty much everything I hate about pitchfork: Jim O'Rourke: Halfway To a Threeway  --MikeI bet this guy talks loudly on his cell phone in public, as if people are dying to hear whatever he has to say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 I bet this guy talks loudly on his cell phone in public, as if people are dying to hear whatever he has to say. ...and sighs heavily and glares when he notices someone scoffing at him for this behavior. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 This review is the epitome of pretty much everything I hate about pitchfork: Jim O'Rourke: Halfway To a Threeway  --MikeOy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SGL Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Â No way... No one at pitchfork is anywhere near as cool as Ari Gold. And none of them would want to hung it out... Unless it was an obscure indie musician (but they would do more than just hug... ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Oy.AND he spelled "camaraderie" wrong. Ass. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jff Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 I know. The reviewer actually goes as far to attack Jim on a personal level... it's crazy how little the music is actually talked about. For the record, the reviewer is the founder and president of Pitchfork. Pathetic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
u2roolz Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Ari Gold is the first thing that popped into my mind when One Wing and Speed Racer talked about someone on their cell phone. The Stay Puft Marshmallow Man is the first thing that that popped into Ray Stantz' mind when thinking about the last thing that could hurt NYC. Kristofor Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ghost of Electricity Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 it's been about a year since i read pitchfork. You folks are making think i should go back and do it again just so i can have an opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Preferred B Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 For the record, the reviewer is the founder and president of Pitchfork. Pathetic.Wait, there's a president of Pitchfork? I don't know why I find that concept so hilarious, but I do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilco (The Album) Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Pitchfork can suck it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
willywoody Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 In Atlanta the main place where people go to get the new releases by "cool" bands is Criminal Records. I read an article about Criminal and the state of the music retail economy a year or so ago. They said when Pitchfork gave something a high score, sales went through the roof. my local indie store owner said the same thing to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cloudsofhiss Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 my local indie store owner said the same thing to me. Of the six "Best New Music" albums on the pitchfork frontpage, none are in the iTunes or Amazon MP3 top 25 selling albums. Their commercial influence is limited to a small and pretty insular group of people. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 Of the six "Best New Music" albums on the pitchfork frontpage, none are in the iTunes or Amazon MP3 top 25 selling albums. Their commercial influence is limited to a small and pretty insular group of people. The small, insular group of people that buys physical copies of records at local stores instead of downloading low-quality mp3s? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wild Frank Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 I'm not sure if there is anyone on here whose heard of 'Pitchfork', but there is a track review of 'Jolly Banker' up on their site this morning. A pretty positive review actually. "Don't let that quaint waltz-time signature or that singsongy chorus fool you: "The Jolly Banker" is a pretty pissed-off song. Woody Guthrie's Depression-era tune accused bankers of having pretty much every ulterior motive imaginable: "When money you're needin' and mouths you are feedin', I'm a jolly banker, jolly banker am I." It gets worse: "I'll come down and help you/ I'll rape you and scalp you." Like Guthrie, Wilco play it more as lightly satirical than as angrily outraged. As an acoustic guitar strums out a 3/4 beat and the organ and slide guitar careen gently into each other, the lilt of the melody first conceals the banker's wrongdoing, the finally reveals and contrasts their sinister extremes. It could have fit perfectly on either of the Mermaid Avenue albums, although this cover sounds more post-cratered-economy than pre-Y2K. Money where their mouth is: Wilco are offering the song free on the web site, with a suggested donation of $2 to the Woody Guthrie Foundation and Archives." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.