Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What the hell, Spain.

 

Heh. It would be pretty sweet if Chile and Switzerland advanced from that group. Though it would seriously screw up my tournament picks.

 

Switzerland epitomize the same brand of anti-football that Jose Mourinho's Inter Milan used to progress and win the Champion's League this year. I hope that Chile can beat them and they don't progress to the second-round. The World Cup even at this stage is shaping up to be the most defense-minded, negative and boring ever. Spain's recent success has been a welcome antidote to the teams organised by coaches to defend with a goal-keeper and two banks of four players pretty much constantly behind the ball. It's a system designed to snuff out any creative moves by your opponents where you are happy to concede possession in the hope you can sneak a goal like Switzerland or score something on the counter-attack in a manner that Inter Milan do so well. Rationally it makes a lot of sense but it's mind-numbling tedious to know see it in game after game. The last thing the World Cup needs is a another crown for a team like Italy in 2006 whose real talent was in being supremely good in defence. Fingers crossed that Germany, Brazil, Argentina or even Spain now can prevail this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Switzerland epitomize the same brand of anti-football that Jose Mourinho's Inter Milan used to progress and win the Champion's League this year. I hope that Chile can beat them and they don't progress to the second-round. The World Cup even at this stage is shaping up to be the most defense-minded, negative and boring ever. Spain's recent success has been a welcome antidote to the teams organised by coaches to defend with a goal-keeper and two banks of four players pretty much constantly behind the ball. It's a system designed to snuff out any creative moves by your opponents where you are happy to concede possession in the hope you can sneak a goal like Switzerland or score something on the counter-attack in a manner that Inter Milan do so well. Rationally it makes a lot of sense but it's mind-numbling tedious to know see it in game after game. The last thing the World Cup needs is a another crown for a team like Italy in 2006 whose real talent was in being supremely good in defence. Fingers crossed that Germany, Brazil, Argentina or even Spain now can prevail this time.

 

Thank for the explanation,I couldn´t tell it better (literally,haha).

I have lots of hope in Spain´s way of play,not only as a fan,but as a football lover too.

Mourinho´s anti-football can win one battle ( :ohwell my BarÇa),but not the war :pirate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic win for Argentina and a great game to watch. Gotta love Maradona - start potentially the toughest game in the group with four strikers. Higuain looked so much better playing up the middle and was in exactly the right place for each goal of his hat-trick. It looks like Argentina have finally worked out how to accommodate Messi's unique talents. They look suspect at the back conceding a horrible goal. It would seem South Korea came into the match thinking that a win against Nigeria in the next match would be enough for them to proceed. Sloppier and less focused than I expected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For France, it's alternate years of all or nothing:

 

1998: Won the cup

2002: Scored ZERO goals in group stage

2006: Finalist - lost on penalty kicks

2010: ZERO goals scored so far in group stage...

I bet the Irish would have put up a better showing! I hope the South African's kick the French's butts and keep them scoreless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For France, it's alternate years of all or nothing:

 

1998: Won the cup

2002: Scored ZERO goals in group stage

2006: Finalist - lost on penalty kicks

2010: ZERO goals scored so far in group stage...

 

 

Truly shocking in their two games especialy today. Uncommitted, disorganised and obviously lacking unity. Spain underperformed yesterday but u couldn't fault their desire unlike France today. Well done Mexico. The possibility of Argentina vs Mexico in the next round sounds great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some shit referring going on so far today.

 

Though if the USA hadn't stood around looking lost and helpless for 50 minutes, the referring wouldn't have mattered/

No kidding. What the hell is with this team that they need like 20 minutes to realize they are actually playing a match?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot do that against Algeria. They have to win this game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not really optimistic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On another board I'm on, someone posted this. Sounds about right:

 

So Wednesday basically breaks down like this for the U.S.

 

Slovenia defeats England:

 

With a draw or a win vs Algeria, the U.S. advances as the group runner up.

 

England defeats Slovenia:

 

U.S. advances with a win vs Algeria. Whether they advance as the group winner or runner up comes down to goal differential (i.e., they would need to defeat Algeria by a wider margin than the margin by which England defeats Slovenia).

 

U.S. is eliminated if they draw vs Algeria.

 

Slovenia and England draw:

 

U.S. advances with a win vs Algeria. U.S. wins the group if they defeat Algeria by two goals.

 

U.S. may advance with a draw. They'd have three points, as would England. What's the next tiebreaker, if points and goal differential are equal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not according to this (admittedly unsourced) article and the analysts (Alexi Lalas and Steve McManaman, I think) discussing the situation on ESPN during England-Algeria.

 

Total goals follows goals differential, and then they draw lots if they remain tied.

 

wow, you're right. i always thought it was ranking.

 

i looked this up, and these are the fifa rules:

 

The ranking of each team in each group will be determined as follows:

a) greatest number of points obtained in all group matches;

B) goal difference in all group matches;

c) greatest number of goals scored in all group matches.

If two or more teams are equal on the basis of the above three criteria,

their rankings will be determined as follows:

d) greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between

the teams concerned;

e) goal difference resulting from the group matches between the

teams concerned;

f) greater number of goals scored in all group matches between the

teams concerned;

g) drawing of lots by the FIFA Organising Committee.

 

once it gets past D i really don't understand what the hell they are talking about. surely if you get to D and it's equal then E & F will automatically be the same, won't they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

once it gets past D i really don't understand what the hell they are talking about. surely if you get to D and it's equal then E & F will automatically be the same, won't they?

Do these rules only apply to World Cup finals? Or to World Cup qualifying as well (where teams play each other more than once)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...