Jump to content

Recording process question.


Recommended Posts

Anybody know the album-by-album recording process? Live in the stuido? Track by track? Steady mix of both? Obviously there are overdubs and things, but i'm curious as to which albums they decided to do which way. Which method do you prefer? Why do you think they wanted to switch it up? I'm pretty confident both A.M. and BT were live for the most part, and Summerteeth and AGIB were tracked individually...the film IATTBYH indicates that Yankee was live for the most part, but i'm not for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As a musician myself, I've always loved the idea of doing things differently each time to get a different experience and result. I know YHF might have been recorded live at time but there are also obvious cuts/punch ins etc. Sky Blue Sky was mostly recorded with everyone in a circle looking at each other which I think is really cool. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about BT, and AM, but Summerteeth was an overdub fest.  Bennett even played some of the drums.

A lot of the core takes from YHF had a live band thing going, but then overdubs got crazy, and I think a lot of the live stuff got thrown out.

AGIB is almost 100% live, as is SBS.

WTA had most of the rhythm guitar, keys, bass and drums done live (vocals, not sure) in New Zealand with Nels and Jorgensen's stuff being added later at the loft.

I think TWL has a lot of live tracks at its core too, but some pretty free exploration in the overdub process.

 

I think they have it figured out at this point, and they've gotten the loft to a level where they don't even need to mix elsewhere.  With that Neve in the room they've got all the infrastructure to make amazing albums with engineer rates being the only ongoing cost as they work.  Pretty sweet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh I see. Ghost was really recorded mostly live? That surprises me. If anyone knows anything else about Ghost's recording process, please share! I'd love to know the story behind that. Any interviews would be helpful as well! The "written on protools-converted to studio" story is interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See THIS THREAD on gearslutz.  I found this in another thread here on the board (that specific thread I can't remember anymore...)

 

It's got some comments from an engineer who worked the Ghost Is Born sessions.   Look for the posts by Chris Shaw.  There are also some great pictures of the room set up that he posted.  There is a lot of great info here.

 

The Wilco Book also has a lot of awesome stuff about Sear Sound and the writing/constructing/recording of Ghost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Which method do you prefer? 

 

The last several records I have done, it has been 75% overdubs, but this is because of limited space and musicians.   :)

 

There's something to be said for recording live and it can really bring out the chemistry in a band, but I have found that both live and overdubbing can bring the same sounding results.  If you want to still get a good cohesive sound, I think its important to have a good click-track to start with.  

 

For example, a full band recording with drums, the click-track should be a metronome with a rough mix of rhythm guitar and lead vocals.  The drummer and bass player can then play along with this to lay down their parts at the same time (or separately  depending on your available inputs on your board).  A good drummer can play along with the metronome with no issues.  After the rhythm section is laid down, its really a matter of preference on what you lay down next (usually guitars, misc instruments, vocals last).  

 

I have done 4 full length records using this method and have been very happy with the results.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think TWL is the best-sounding of the three records made by this lineup -- closer to the sound of what drew me to Wilco records in the first place. YHF has some really nice touches and is a great headphone record, but AGIB, to my ears, is a real feast. Always finding new little sonic details. I think BT is pretty good on headphones, but I prefer the first three Wilco albums played loud through big speakers or in the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My favorite recordings of my bands have been everyone live but all amps isolated in a different, sound proof, room.

 

A feed of a click track and all amps and mics sent to the drummer's headphones to get the drums recorded with everyone "live" then individual tracks recorded on top of the "clean" drum track.

 

I hope that made sense....

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are are many many aprroaches that can be taken to good effect.  One recording done with one of my bands broke just about all the rules you could:  we plugged guitars direct in to the computer, played to a click track, did all the amps on software sims, added some keys and even pedal steel from high-quality samples. the drums were done last, and live.  I was sceptical about doing things this way, but the results were surprisingly good.  the key was having a good engineer (who also happened to be the guitarist)  

 

I'm not saying that it would be my first choice of how to do it again, but just raising the point that different approaches can be taken to good effect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My band usually records completely live, or a scratch guitar to a click track, then drums to that guitar, then delete the scratch, and do all guitars including bass, live together, then other instruments separate, then vocals. As far as Wilco, AGIB and TWL are the best sounding to my ears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My least favorite as far as recording quality is Being There, even though it is probably my favorite Wilco record.  The quality is too bright, almost tinny..  The album was mixed very well, but terribly mastered.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the minority, as I like Summerteeth best. Very Beatlesesque. The others are too dry and claustrophobic for my taste.

Can't argue with that. I find new things with every listen on ST. Especially on tracks like PS and ELT. Very much like the White Album or MMT from the Beatles. The mix is perfect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason, I sometimes feel totally overwhelmed by ST on headphones -- too much happening, like I'm over-saturated in sound. Or buried in sound...

 

Maybe I need better headphones. AGIB just sounds warm and intimate to me, more so than any other.

I do see how some aspects of Summerteeth can be overwhelming, but something I love about it with headphones, is the stereo mix. The use of panning. If you have just one headphone in, you can put the other one in and hear the track transform into a completely new entity. A lot like the White Album like I mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...