Guest McGuffin Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I still don't understand why you felt the need to comment. However, all of your comments that I've seen are negative to some degree. Your comment is negative as well. Think of it in terms of Less Than You Think. You know it's 12 minutes of noise, right? Have you listened to it more than once? I doubt it. I read a few sentences, saw Less Than You Think and didn't bother with the rest of it. It's not a very difficult concept to grasp. I just didn't bite on the self-indulgence. Hope this helps. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
-seven Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I don't think the point is that you didn't want to read the post, it's that you felt the need to comment on it anyway.It would be kind of like people posting to let us know that they just skipped Less Than You Think. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest McGuffin Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Interesting that you use the term 'intelligentsia'...I had originally used it, but I dropped it because I found it to be too pretentious.Somehow, I find it fitting that you used the term. My use of the term "Intelligentsia" is "too pretentious." How? I like the coffee and drink it. No pretentiousness there, chief. Nice try though on the attack dog front. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
parisisstale Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 have to side w/ mcguffin on this one.....ha, yeah right, but what's a thread without at least one dick great post mr. crow, couldn't have said it any better Quote Link to post Share on other sites
moxiebean Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Attack Dog Front would be a great band name. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Doug C Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I, too, was unsure about reading Crow's post when I saw the length but i am glad that I had, and used, the time to do so. Earnest and honest musings on a subject that the poster is interested in. That's what message boards are all about. McGuffin's post was a lot shorter and took no time at all but I am not glad that I read it. Irrelevant to the post, negative simply for the sake of trying to look superior and causing a "Fuck, he likely acts that way in person" realization. That's what message boards are all about. Angel or devil? Internet, I trip through your wires. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted September 26, 2011 Author Share Posted September 26, 2011 Your comment is negative as well. Think of it in terms of Less Than You Think. You know it's 12 minutes of noise, right? Have you listened to it more than once? I doubt it. I read a few sentences, saw Less Than You Think and didn't bother with the rest of it. It's not a very difficult concept to grasp. I just didn't bite on the self-indulgence. Hope this helps.I was simply noting that I had used the same term, and the reasons why I decided not to use it.I think it is pretty interesting that we would both use a relatively obscure term in an indie band thread.And I really don't care that you didn't read the post. I'll admit it is somewhat self-indulgent.HOWEVER, feeling the need to post that you didn't read it instead of simply not reading it is, well, self-indulgent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest McGuffin Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I'll admit it is somewhat self-indulgent.HOWEVER, feeling the need to post that you didn't read it instead of simply not reading it is, well, self-indulgent. Agree 100% with that first statement. Disagree with the second statement. I read the first paragraph or so and then saw the length and stopped. If you post on the internet and aren't concise, many folks won't bother reading your work simply due to length. Oh, and you should mail order yourself some Intelligentsia coffee. Top notch, I say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
theashtraysays Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 If you post on the internet and aren't concise, many folks won't bother reading your work simply due to length.See also: "twitter" Can we get back to talking about this Wilco thing now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
choo-choo-charlie Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 It's a message board -- it's not a "work." I love this album. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted September 26, 2011 Author Share Posted September 26, 2011 Oh, and you should mail order yourself some Intelligentsia coffee. Top notch, I say. I get it now...you were making a cute reference to the coffee. I thought you were using it in the literal sense (as I was doing...hence my deletion of the term on grounds of pretension). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
welch79 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You saw the length of the post, decided you didn't want to invest the time to read it -- yet you still dismiss it?and don't forget to mention: post a coupla times as well! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Autumnteeth Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 That book sucks. It's to thick. Thick being the operative word. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Autumnteeth Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Your comment is negative as well. Think of it in terms of Less Than You Think. You know it's 12 minutes of noise, right? Have you listened to it more than once? I doubt it. I read a few sentences, saw Less Than You Think and didn't bother with the rest of it. It's not a very difficult concept to grasp. I just didn't bite on the self-indulgence. Hope this helps. Don;t even want to search for the cartoon that depicts the dbag saying I can't go to sleep now, something is wrong on the internet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pivoboy Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Crow Daddy nails it and I should have been more lucid in my commentary as I think one of my semi-sodden postings once alluded to this very idea once so pithily stated by the Starship: ``Fuuuuuuuuck you we do what we want.'' God Bless em for that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted September 30, 2011 Author Share Posted September 30, 2011 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ghost of Electricity Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 Crow: right on. McGuffin: well, i don't want to break the rules, so i'll just say nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.