myboyblue Posted September 4, 2008 Share Posted September 4, 2008 barking up the wrong tree that's perfect. Why I still am surprised by some of the dipshit comments made on the inner web is beyond me. Yes, Orkie, I'm looking at you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 It really is a semantic argument. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LouieB Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 that's perfect. Why I still am surprised by some of the dipshit comments made on the inner web is beyond me. Yes, Orkie, I'm looking at you.Double trolling... It isn't strictly about semantics. alt.country was something different than country rock, no doubt about it and no one was calling NRPS or Poco or even Gram Parsons alt.country...it was always country rock. Townes Van Zandt was just trying to write a bunch of good songs and have others play them if they would. Willie and Waylon were Outlaws. Even Steve Earle was hitting the tail end of outlawdom. LouieB Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 It all depends on whether you believe that a genre title that wasn't created until the late 80's can apply to artists who had a similar sound and approach to music prior to them, then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LouieB Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 It all depends on whether you believe that a genre title that wasn't created until the late 80's can apply to artists who had a similar sound and approach to music prior to them, then.Well okay I half see your point, except that the music that was being made DID have varous labels, but not specifically alt.country. Certainly the artists that we are talking about influenced those that I we can half agree are alt.country, but they weren't making music under that banner. Certainly alot of groups were playing country type music; in fact artists never stopped making country and country influenced music. But add some punk and a bit more attitude and it became alt.country. Artists such as Earle and Van Zandt and EmmyLou and Waylon and Willie and the Flatlanders and a ton of others were all making country music outside of the established routes, venues, styles, etc. So. really there isn't much of an argument here, just what applies I suppose. LouieB Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I personally don't think labels are all that important. If someone wants to call Johnny Cash Alt.Country, I can dig it. It doesn't really change the music. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 We're taking an historical perspective here. Subjective names for music that occurs along and morphs out of a timeline. What precedes has much to do with the ethos of a particular ("labeled" ) genre of music (whether incorporating or rejecting). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CortezTheKiller Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 You'd be wrong of course. http://folkmusic.about.com/od/artistsaz/p/Townes_profile.htmIt's rather unfortunate that you gather your knowledge from the internet. You can come up with countless links to prove your point. Townes = country, folk, and blues. The categorization of "alt.country" doesn't fit here. Nice try, but your way off. Throw a 'D' on the beginning of the name too please. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
markosis Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I think its pretty funny how long a conversation can go on when all we're talking about is semantics. I couldn't care less what you call it, alt-country, intellegent country, country rock, who gives a shit? Do you need to really differentiate between alt-country and country anyway? All it does is complicate things. If you get rid of a meaningless sub-genre tag, and all you're left with is "country", it surely wouldn't bother me that The Jayhawks and Garth Brooks share a similar genre tag. It wouldn't change my listening habits or my opinion of the music. Why does everyone get so hung up on the label? Is it a big deal if someone thinks Townes Van Zandt played folk music, and someone else thinks he played country, and someone else thinks he played country-folk? Does that change the way the music sounds to you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orkie Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Yes.Before there was punk there could be no alt country. That's laughable. Most alt.coutnry has no punk element whatsoever. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orkie Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 The dude is part right: Yup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
junkiesmile Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 So if a label doesn't exist at the inception it can't be applied in retrospect ? Chicken,egg,egg,chicken Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I have Sky Blue Sky tagged alt country just to piss people off. Johnny Cash too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Littlebear Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 So if a label doesn't exist at the inception it can't be applied in retrospect ? Chicken,egg,egg,chicken I think it can, but it just depends how you use it in your personal view. There's free fancy about labels. In my humble opinion, Townes Van Zandt isn't more alt. country than alt. blues or alt. folk. I think he was also an alt. guitarist, an alt. lyricist and an alt. human being. And here's an alt. banana: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 so much depends upon a red wheel barrow glazed with rain water beside the white chickens. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 That's laughable. Most alt.coutnry has no punk element whatsoever.What's your damage, dude? That's like saying reggae didn't grow out of ska. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 What's your damage, dude? Wheelbarrow has a wobbly wheel, I suspect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Yeah you'll have that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OOO Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 so much depends upon a red wheel barrow glazed with rain water beside the white chickens. I hated that section in poetry. That god damn plum poem. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Why do you hate William Carlos Williams? Williams' most anthologized poem is "The Red Wheelbarrow", considered an example of the Imagist movement's style and principles (see also "This Is Just To Say"). However, Williams, like his associate Ezra Pound, had long ago rejected the imagist movement by the time this poem was published as part of Spring and All in 1923. Williams is more strongly associated with the American Modernist movement in literature, and saw his poetic project as a distinctly American one; he sought to renew language through the fresh, raw idiom that grew out of America's cultural and social heterogeneity, at the same time freeing it from what he saw as the worn-out language of British and European culture.Williams tried to invent an entirely fresh form, an American form of poetry whose subject matter was centered on everyday circumstances of life and the lives of common people. He then came up with the concept of the variable foot evolved from years of visual and auditory sampling of his world from the first person perspective as a part of the day in the life as a physician. The variable foot is rooted within the multi-faceted American Idiom. This discovery was a part of his keen observation of how radio and newspaper influenced how people communicated and represents the "machine made out of words" (as he described a poem in the introduction to his book, The Wedge) just as the mechanistic motions of a city can become a consciousness. Williams didn Quote Link to post Share on other sites
myboyblue Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 That's laughable. Most alt.coutnry has no punk element whatsoever.good bit Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 traditional meter I'd like to stuff a traditional meter somewhere Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PopTodd Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 That's laughable. Most alt.coutnry has no punk element whatsoever. Just like Uncle Tupelo's No Depression, right?They just named a magazine about the subject and the whole damn movement after that raucous motha of a record. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
M. (hristine Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I'd like to stuff a traditional meter somewhereWaxing poetic? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 waxing the shaft, maybe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.