Panther Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/washingt...amp;oref=slogin Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 Good. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jules Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 cool beans Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mfwahl Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 Finally. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 Good. cool beans Finally. I'm guessing this wasn't the response the OP was looking for. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Winston Legthigh Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 I think I played that level of Splinter Cell already... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 Yeah, I don't have too much of a problem with this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mountain bed Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Didn't Johnny B. Goode say that we shouldn't do that? That Pakistan is sovereign nation? Oh yeah, that was LAST MONTH. Personally - I'm not necessarily opposed to this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lamradio Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Awesome, it's about freakin time. Now that Bush doesn't have to be stuck up Musharraf Quote Link to post Share on other sites
giraffo Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 I think I played that level of Splinter Cell already... same Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Duck-Billed Catechist Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 It raises the question...in light of Pakistani outrage over previous attacks and talk of withdrawing from the US' war on terror, at what point might we be simply at war with Pakistan? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 I like Hindus much better anyway. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrRain422 Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Didn't Johnny B. Goode say that we shouldn't do that? That Pakistan is sovereign nation? Oh yeah, that was LAST MONTH. Personally - I'm not necessarily opposed to this. Palin said in the Charlie Gibson interview that it would be alright to invade Pakistan too, though I guess she doesn't necessarily speak for McCain. It raises the question...in light of Pakistani outrage over previous attacks and talk of withdrawing from the US' war on terror, at what point might we be simply at war with Pakistan? Pakistan better get in line. We have wars to fight with Iran and Russia first. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
yankhotelfox Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Gripping, compelling and rich. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lost highway Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Pakistan, Russia, Iran all someone has to do is get Kim Jong-Il out of the hospital and we could have WWIII. This one is the nuclear holocaust edition. So long world. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Seems like an overreaction. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lost highway Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Absolutely. We've just been drumming up enemies a little fast for my world view. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
John Smith Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 I have no problem with this. Seems like it should have been done long ago and...it is pretty much what Obama said he would do and was ridiculed for. Interesting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 I can summon no righteous indignation nor do I have any crocodile tears to shed over Pakistani sovereignty. We should have Special Forces A Teams and the Delta Force on the ground after the Stark incident going after Bin Laden. We should have been using a rapier instead of a sledge hammer all along. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stooka Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 An Osama capture would amost certainly secure the election for the Republicans. I smell a rat!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 An Osama capture would amost certainly secure the election for the Republicans. I smell a rat!!! I doubt that Osama will ever be found. If there was ever going to be an October surprise rolled out with a capture, we would have seen Saddam kept on ice until October 2004. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.