Winston Legthigh

Smoking after sex Obama likes cigarettes Elected and laid

Now that I read a bulk of that thread, I can see where DCB is coming from - we need someone else to take the helm of "world's greatest band" There doesn't seem to be anyone that is both large enough and dangerous enough to inspire a generation. But, my favorite quote from that thread is:

Yay! A wide receiver joke!

Some feel compelled to put others' tastes down. Meh.

Lions: Lost Cowboys: Lost Both are good for the Lions draft! Yay!

I can still hum the tune that plays throughout Contra. Don't forget Mike Tyson Boxing and Hockey.

Then, it's telling that either people are ignoring you, or don't give a shit about your thesis?

Yes, it IS rather telling that nobody is defending your claims.

Ok, Making Flippy Floppy. Everybody, Get.In.Line.

Sorry - didn't realize the positions of agnostic atheists or agnostic theists were below you.

my apologies to both Neon and The Maker for the quote above (mine, not kwall's). I had deleted it from my original post, but not before kwall had posted it. It was a condescending remark, and doesn't acknowledge that there are also great minds on the atheist side of the argument as well (of which Neon and The Maker might be, though the evidence is scant.)

But you don't even know if I believe in God or not... (I don't).

Speaking of belief, I can't believe that you and I are on the same side of an argument! Regardless, I just have this to say - the argument is out there that belief in a deity is a crutch of small minds. That's fine and might be true in certain situations. I don't think it's universally true. There are many great minds that are theists. Conversely, I offer that the need to have an absolute answer in an unprovable situation is in the same ballpark of the previoiusly mentioned small mind. The fabled flying spaghetti monster is often brought up. Does it exist? I don't know - I'm doubtful. I h

Why are you so threatened by the fact that you can't prove the non-existence of God? Also - both you and Neon seems to have difficulty grasping the difference between "evidence" and "proof" Both of you claim that there is no evidence of God. That's silly - there's plenty of evidence. There's merely no proof. Example: In a murder trial, the only evidence submitted is a splotch of blood on the floor. It's not proof of any crime committed, but it's certainly evidence. Evidence submitted for God's existence might be the Earth itself. Some may be moved to interpret this evidence as an argumen

I prefer hashbrownies.

Making Flippy Floppy & Girlfriend is Better Talking Heads

Uy.

Was anyone else on this board in NYC to march in protest of _______ during the 2004 RNC? That was quite a scene.

Igloo-livin, blubber-eatin motherfuckers!

I'm pro-Obama, but I hate eskimos.

Or papas a la huancaina? ('spect to my Peruana mama) Potatoes DID originate from Peru, after all. Racists.

fuck this. Where's the Au Gratin platform? (Conflict of interest disclaimer: I made awesome au gratin potatoes last weekend)

I thought it was the classic bait and switch to be able to blame someone else if the kids think the presents are sucky.

Athiests don't like to admit that non belief in a deity also requires the leap of faith that a believer requires to take the opposite side of the argument. Since a deity's existence or non-existence is non-provable, a definite statement for either side requires a leap of faith.