gogo Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 I've transcribed below the Tape Op article about Jay Bennett. This is the best thing I've read about him since his passing. Despite his falling out with Tweedy/Wilco, I can see from this article why it must've been inspiring to work with Jay. ----------------------------------------- Jay Bennett, by Jason T. Lewis ... "Look, I could do that. I could play a bunch of stuff and I could Wilco all over your record, but then it wouldn't be you. You know what you want and I know that you can do it. I'll step in when I need to." ...That's great. Thanks, jff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Francis X. Hummel Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Fuck yeah, that's a great piece. I might pull the trigger and buy the EP he's referring to. Jason Lewis - Happy All the Time Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jff Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Fuck yeah, that's a great piece. I might pull the trigger and buy the EP he's referring to. Jason Lewis - Happy All the Time I don't know what the recording is, but I'd like to get a copy. Do you know what it is? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Francis X. Hummel Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 click on the link Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Analogman Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 I actually know that dude. Or rather, I use to know him well enough to speak to him. We had some classes together in college. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 I'm going to go ahead and say again that I don't understand the extent to which people knock Jay's portrayal in IATTBYH. I saw exactly what Jason says he didn't, in the film - an enormously creative man who would go to ANY lengths to get just the right sound. What I also saw was someone who, in the process, strained some personal relationships because he would go to the lengths he did to get the sound, and that sound wasn't necessarily what the group wanted. His approach to work definitely comes off in both portrayals as a potential liability for personal relationships; in one case we see that happens, and in the other it doesn't. I guess what I'm trying to say is that the Jay described in Jason Lewis' article is the same one I see in IATTBYH. Jay produced incredible music and executed amazing visions, but Jason Lewis' portrayal too shows a man who definitely had the capacity to grate on people that were not prepared to create with him on those terms. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jff Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 click on the link duh, sorry. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MattZ Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 thanks for taking the time to type that, jff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kidsmoke Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 That was a beautiful piece, jff. Thanks for sharing. Speed Racer, I concur with what you've said...I saw that Jay, too. A great talent and a very dedicated guy. Reading a piece like this, I feel even sadder at his early death. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beltmann Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 Great piece. Thanks for posting, jff. Speed Racer, I concur with what you've said...I saw that Jay, too.Me too. In fact, the Jay I saw in the film made me a bigger fan; I'm not sure I would have followed his solo career so closely (and with such patience) without having seen those glimpses. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 I want to echo the sentiment that the IATTBYH movie made me feel more sympathetic toward Jay than Jeff. What Speed Racer said is spot on for me too - in that Ashes/HMD scene, he was trying to figure out exactly what was going to be on the record, exactly where one song was was stopping and the next was starting. He seemed to care about it much more than Jeff did (in that moment), and I've never been able to relate to the idea that the scene shows how Jay had worn out his welcome. If anything I've always been disappointed in Jeff's actions in that scene (with a grain of salt, of course). The record - the "art" - seemed only to matter to Jay in that scene, and that's sad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mpolak21 Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 I want to echo the sentiment that the IATTBYH movie made me feel more sympathetic toward Jay than Jeff. What Speed Racer said is spot on for me too - in that Ashes/HMD scene, he was trying to figure out exactly what was going to be on the record, exactly where one song was was stopping and the next was starting. He seemed to care about it much more than Jeff did (in that moment), and I've never been able to relate to the idea that the scene shows how Jay had worn out his welcome. If anything I've always been disappointed in Jeff's actions in that scene (with a grain of salt, of course). The record - the "art" - seemed only to matter to Jay in that scene, and that's sad. Yeah, neither really seemed right in the scene. Jay seemed hyper focused on wanting to be understood and trying to get the mix perfect. The only thing that really seemed to matter to Jay was the art, it gave us two masterpiece albums, but ultimately cost Jay his band and one of his best friends. Jeff was acting like anyone with a throbbing migraine would. I think the biggest factor in the perception that Jay was somehow the bad guy in that film is the fact that Bennett was the one that got canned. If Jay and Jeff's parts had been switched and Tweedy was the one that got fired, I think people would have been just as critical towards Jeff. --Mike Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jff Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 I could be wrong, but it seemed to me that Jeff and Jay were on the same page in terms of what they were attempting to do with the HMD intro, but for whatever reason they were unable to realize it. I think if they each had done the version they were striving towards, the end products would have been virtually identical. If each of them had stopped talking, and simply listened to what Jay was working on, there may not have been a conflict at all. Of course, this theory discounts however much footage there was relaing to the conflict that didn't make it into the film. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Oooh, thanks. And here I thought I had explained myself poorly. they were unable to realize it. My perception of that scene was always that Jeff finally "got" what Jay was saying, realized it was the same thing that he was saying, but Jay still wanted to explain why Jeff didn't understand him earlier. "I don't have to understand you all the time," always makes me a little sad to hear; it's true for every good, healthy relationship, but in that context it always sounds so sad to me. That scene was a glimpse of two people doing all the wrong things when they were each having a bad day, but I think it also illustrates some of the bad habits their relationship was starting to develop - what happens when co-dependent becomes co-dependent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 It doesn't help that I don't know what the hell they're talking about in that scene. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jff Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 It doesn't help that I don't know what the hell they're talking about in that scene. Basically, they're both saying "Heavy Metal Drummer needs to start off with 8 beats worth of a really goofy and dated drum machine rhythm". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Speed Racer Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Basically, they're both saying "Heavy Metal Drummer needs to start off with 8 beats worth of a really goofy and dated drum machine rhythm". ...with Jay phrasing it: "when Ashes ends, the drum machine starts," and Jeff saying, "the drum machine starts at the beginning of Heavy Metal Drummer." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jff Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 ...with Jay phrasing it: "when Ashes ends, the drum machine starts," and Jeff saying, "the drum machine starts at the beginning of Heavy Metal Drummer." That sums up my take on it. I always felt the better examples of the growing wedge between Bennett and Tweedy were the scenes in which Bennett wanted to play some "easy rockers" at an upcoming show, rather than working up some of the newer tunes, and the scene in which Tweedy claims that "two guitars is obsolete", to which Bennett responds "I don't know what that means." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
schoenfraun Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Tweedy claims that "two guitars is obsolete," to which Bennett responds "I don't know what that means." And that's why Wilco occasionally has 3 guitars on stage these days (with 2 keyboards)...like on the new Tonight Show. Totally obsolete, eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 That sums up my take on it. I always felt the better examples of the growing wedge between Bennett and Tweedy were the scenes in which Bennett wanted to play some "easy rockers" at an upcoming show, rather than working up some of the newer tunes, and the scene in which Tweedy claims that "two guitars is obsolete", to which Bennett responds "I don't know what that means." Listen to the commentary on the dvd and you will hear the real intent of Jeff's comments. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Listen to the commentary on the dvd and you will hear the real intent of Jeff's comments.As given by Jeff, after the fact, without Jay present? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sweet Papa Crimbo Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 As given by Jeff, after the fact, without Jay present? did you listen to it? The context was referring to the song they were playing, not the two guitar thing in total. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 did you listen to it? The context was referring to the song they were playing, not the two guitar thing in total.Transcript? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mountain bed Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 I kind of always thought that the 'two guitars are obsolete' comment was just the kind of thing someone would say knowing that such a comment would push the buttons of the other person involved. Like you would do with someone you've lived with or been close to for a long time. Only this was on film. Sigh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kidsmoke Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 I kind of always thought that the 'two guitars are obsolete' comment was just the kind of thing someone would say knowing that such a comment would push the buttons of the other person involved. Like you would do with someone you've lived with or been close to for a long time. Only this was on film. Sigh. That's exactly how I've always seen it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.