Analogman

What year? I only say that as cassette machines/cassettes were not all that common in the the time period of say, 1968-1970. As far as I have read, anyhow. I have heard of things like this popping up from time to time. Actually, there was a taper who never put his stuff from the early 70s out there before who is now sharing.

You can't - that is a Bit Torrent site. You have to know how to do Bit Torrent, sign-up with the site, and then download it.

I doubt the cassette is the master tape, most likely, it is a dup from a reel to reel recording. This is a great site to check such things: In from the Storm • Unofficial Jimi Hendrix Material

I've never heard of that. I have quad sound on my receiver. You are making me think of the trick we use to do with headphone jacks back in the day. Actually, I think I have seen some tracks out there where someone has manipulated Beatle songs using that very trick.

One thing I never messed with much - Beatles releases on tape. I have Beatles VI, and Let It Be. I think those are the only two I ever bought. As I recall, the Beatles VI tape sounds absolutely terrible.

Of course, the track listing is also different on the Capitol releases. I noticed that the price of those Capitol CD boxes is dropping for the first time.

So we are getting a new transfer of the mix the George Martin did.

Rob. Don't worry, it will be there eventually.

I don't know if this is still correct or not: Please login (Wilcoworld link) If you do a search in this section, you will find a lot of threads about the DVD downloads. But - I think all of those old links don't work anymore - since they changed things around on their website.

That's right. You are an old dude. I hope the master tapes did not get trashed back in the 1990s. It could be that they are simply to far gone to do a new digital transfer. That is probably talked about somewhere, but there is so much stuff out there about these releases, I may have missed it.

Revolution #9 backwards Turn me on, dead man.

That's good point. I still feel that way. And - The whole ider of The Monkees comes from The Beatle movies.

Ever play it backwards? Actually, I saw a deal on a blog the other day that had all The Beatles songs backwards.

I want to get the new ones, but the price keeps me away. I wonder if The White Album poster will be censored this time around. Number 9, Number 9, Number 9....(article from No Depression)

It's not something I would sit down and listen to for fun, but it is part of the album. The legal deal is a whole other trip. Of course, they supposedly worked things out in the years prior to John being killed. I have read a lot of Beatles books also. The first one I read was in 1977 or 78. That is all we have to go on - the books, and the stories that get handed down over time.

That's a shame, really. They should have went original all the way.

That is true. But, of course, John would not go for Eastman either. As a friend of mine use to say - it took all four of them to make the band. We all have our preferences, of course. I am not really a Paul fan, but in the context of The Beatles, he was needed to make the magic that they gave us.

The other side of that is, of course, that Paul decided to run the show after Brian's death. I certainly don't believe him when he says anything nice about Yoko. They have been feuding for years. It is only when there is new money to be made that they seem to put aside their differences. Also - Jeff or anyone else can bad mouth Jay all they want, but Wilco would not be where they are without him. These are some good examples of why bands don't work as a democracy. Someone has to be in charge. But then, the rest of the dudes get tired of that - eventually.

Paul is also a great revisionist. I have not read it, but I am not apt to go by what Paul says.

There does seem to be a little something in each issue that may appeal to more of traditional rock fan. But still, those little bits are overwhelmed by the hype of the month. At least that is the way I see it. I suppose if I was a teenage girl (or whoever their fan base is), then I would be interested in reading about the Jonas Brothers. Rolling Stone has survived though, when a lot of other magazines have gone under. So I guess that is something. No surprise on Ginger Baker. All of those Cream dudes were ego maniacs. But - they are all masters musicians, so they can be that way.

Oddly enough, I saw him on one of those Fox shows once. He was talking just like the character he played on 24 last season.

So it looks like they are going with a new cop/medical show at 9, and then Jay at 10.

I think they still try to put something in there to appeal to the older readers. I received RS for most of the past year due to buying a bunch of stuff at Amazon. Now, they are trying to get me to re-new my subscription. That is not going to happen. Not to long ago, they had a multiple page article/interview with that guy from American Idol. Although it was nice to see a long article, I don't think that guy is worthy of that much ink. Recently, there was an interview with Greg Allman in an issue, which was otherwise filled with Perez Hilton/TMZ/internet type articles. It stuck out like a so

I can't think of the name of the show. Was it this one? Trauma OR I guess not, as this is a medical show.