radiokills Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Why did they need to arrest him in the first place? And god that makes me hate the police, he clearly said he would walk out if they stopped holding him down, and he said he didn't need to be tasered, and they still did it. I don't really know why people think that this whole thing is alright. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 "he said he didn't need to be tasered, and they still did it." Damn, you're right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caliber66 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Why did they need to arrest him in the first place? And god that makes me hate the police, he clearly said he would walk out if they stopped holding him down, and he said he didn't need to be tasered, and they still did it. I don't really know why people think that this whole thing is alright.Right, because if you repeatedly refuse to comply with police directions, then resist arrest, they are just supposed to let you walk away. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
radiokills Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 you're the fucking man dude. so witty and smart, i wish i was just like you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I would tase some people. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 No, but some people who behave in grossly anti-social manners subject themselves to arrest. and I don't think that's unreasonable. Yes, but a large portion of the American public finds homosexuality to be grossly anti-social, i.e. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
radiokills Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Right, because if you repeatedly refuse to comply with police directions, then resist arrest, they are just supposed to let you walk away. i never said they should have let him walk away. and there was absolutely no reason to arrest him in the first place. this whole thing is absolutely ridiculous, i guess in public places we dont have freedom of speech anymore? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 He seems alright to me. He's got fire, that's for sure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lammycat Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Tased guy: I told the cops I'd walk out on my own. They didn't listen. I told them not to tase me. They didn't listen. Curious bystander: But didn't the cops ask you to do a bunch of stuff too and you didn't listen? Tased guy: hem...haw.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Go back and read the entire thread, most of the pro-taser argument centers around his behind the mic behavior, and not that he resisted arrest. you should take about an hour and explore the concepts of sarcasm and hyperbole and then reread the thread in new light. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 you should take about an hour and explore the concepts of sarcasm and hyperbole and then reread the thread in new light. Are you claiming to speak for everyone? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I was claiming that you should reread the thread in that light. Now I claiming you have the reading comprehension of a 3rd grader. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 i never said they should have let him walk away. and there was absolutely no reason to arrest him in the first place. this whole thing is absolutely ridiculous, i guess in public places we dont have freedom of speech anymore?It was not at a public place. It was in a forum put together by Kerry and his people. He didn't abide by their rules, and he continues disturbing the peace.That is the thing people don't get. It isn't a free speech issue. It was not a public place. By going over the time limit, he was taking away other's right to speak. He then resisted arrest and also ignored police orders.Now I claiming you have the reading comprehension of a 3rd grader.Irony, thy name is Gary. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I assure you I type better than a third grader, but this ain't my machine. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I was claiming that you should reread the thread in that light. Now I claiming you have the reading comprehension of a 3rd grader. Why do you feel the need to make this personal? Have I ever attacked you personally? Do you behave this way in person? You have to love an internet tough guy - the sort who feels all manly behind a keyboard. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tongue-tied Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Why do you feel the need to make this personal? Have I ever attacked you personally? Do you behave this way in person? You have to love an internet tough guy - the sort who feels all manly behind a keyboard. i think you just attacked him personally. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 i think you just attacked him personally. And I think he deserved it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gobias Industries Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Why do you feel the need to make this personal? Have I ever attacked you personally? Do you behave this way in person? You have to love an internet tough guy - the sort who feels all manly behind a keyboard. speaking of the devil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spawn's dad Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Actually I'm fairly manly in person as well. But the issue is a person says one thing and you go off in a wholly unrelated direction, sort of like, well, a third grader. I never made any claims for any one. I simply said that you should explore the thread in that light. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tongue-tied Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 And I think he deserved it. so he was running his mouth and he got what he deserved, huh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 speaking of the devil Care to explain? So far in this thread I've been called a douchebag on multiple occasions, a dipshit and an idiot - please review the thread and point out where I've done the same or even retaliated - oh, but wait, that's right, I haven't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Yes, but a large portion of the American public finds homosexuality to be grossly anti-social, i.e. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Actually I'm fairly manly in person as well. But the issue is a person says one thing and you go off in a wholly unrelated direction, sort of like, well, a third grader. I never made any claims for any one. I simply said that you should explore the thread in that light. Hmmm Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I am so NOT in favor of tazing gays, and I'm a bit irked that you are implying otherwise. :realmad I Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.