Gobias Industries Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Wasn't Lincoln a Representative? Yes. He was a Representative. Only for one term. Didn't run for re-election because he called bullshit on Polk's war and paid the price in votes because of it. Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Why are religious experience and a open-mindedness and a respect of inquiry mutually exclusive in his eyes? Can't someone believe in god and still have an open mind about it? I think many people here have proven they can. Hitchens seems very closeminded to me. Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Why are religious experience and a open-mindedness and a respect of inquiry mutually exclusive in his eyes? Can't someone believe in god and still have an open mind about it? I think many people here have proven they can. Hitchens seems very closeminded to me.Not having read the book but heard him talk about it, I think he sees religion as supremely hypocritical (thus invalid) and a fearsome tool evil people use to manipulate the faithful. I think he sees it as a giant rip-off, both in a material and intellectual sense. And since the misuse of religion is really a clear and present danger to all of us on the planet, he thinks it's too important to take a live-and-let-live approach. I think. Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 and, yet, you at least seemingly, continue to try. Question - would all of those who would (seriously) entertain switching religious beliefs or the definition of life based on a fellow board member Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Not having read the book but heard him talk about it, I think he sees religion as supremely hypocritical (thus invalid) and a fearsome tool evil people use to manipulate the faithful. I think he sees it as a giant rip-off, both in a material and intellectual sense. And since the misuse of religion is really a clear and present danger to all of us on the planet, he thinks it's too important to take a live-and-let-live approach. I think. And I'm never going to be able to take someone who is so close minded seriously when they criticize religion for close mindedness. Link to post Share on other sites
Winston Legthigh Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Question - would all of those who would (seriously) entertain switching religious beliefs or the definition of life based on a fellow board member Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Not having read the book but heard him talk about it, I think he sees religion as supremely hypocritical (thus invalid) and a fearsome tool evil people use to manipulate the faithful. I think he sees it as a giant rip-off, both in a material and intellectual sense. And since the misuse of religion is really a clear and present danger to all of us on the planet, he thinks it's too important to take a live-and-let-live approach. I think. I think you Link to post Share on other sites
bjorn_skurj Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I would imagine Hitchens has given it a great deal of thought, come to his conclusions and wrote a best-selling book about them. The "great deal of thought" part raises it above simple close-mindedness. Maybe if Jesus strikes him blind on the road to Damascus, he will reconsider his conclusions. Link to post Share on other sites
sweetheart-mine Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 To combine with the "Scary Things" thread, since it has long been rumored that Lincoln's ghost still haunts the White House, an argument could be made as to whether we really need anyone new in there at all. Think about the history we'd be making--the first non-corporeal president!!! now THIS is a real day-brightener. of course, mccain could fill this role while still alive, but don't anyone ask me to "prove" it. it's an opinion, and a joke by half. and i'd take lincoln's ghost any day of the week! I wonder if we can write him in. the ghost, i mean. Link to post Share on other sites
Good Old Neon Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 And I'm never going to be able to take someone who is so close minded seriously when they criticize religion for close mindedness. He Link to post Share on other sites
solace Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Wasn't Lincoln a Representative? And I would argue that a six-year governor, even of a state that lacks a powerful governor, qualifies as having experience. House of Represenatives + Senate = Congress = Legislature therefore being a member of state legislature = a senator or representative as for GW's stint as governor... that's fine, but would he have gotten there without his daddy being the former President of the US? i'm gonna have to say no on that one... Link to post Share on other sites
quarter23cd Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 and i'd take lincoln's ghost any day of the week! I wonder if we can write him in. the ghost, i mean.Make your vote a historic vote.Lincoln's Ghost '08 I'm Lincoln's Ghost and I approved this message. Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 He Link to post Share on other sites
sweetheart-mine Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Make your vote a historic vote.Lincoln's Ghost '08oh damn. now i wish my bumper stickers weren't already on their way. Link to post Share on other sites
MrRain422 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I'd say that Richard Dawkins is the real intellectual leader of that movement. Hitchens is sometimes funny but not often very insightful. Link to post Share on other sites
sweetheart-mine Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 "QUOTEI'm Lincoln's Ghost and I approved this message." missed that part, plus the magnificent pic. Link to post Share on other sites
bobbob1313 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I'm thinking of writing in "Dead George Carlin" but "Lincoln's Ghost" might be a dark horse. Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Stewart Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Carlin/Zappa '08 Link to post Share on other sites
sweetheart-mine Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I'm thinking of writing in "Dead George Carlin" but "Lincoln's Ghost" might be a dark horse. you might be right. so far these dead choices are winners. Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 If you Link to post Share on other sites
quarter23cd Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I'm thinking of writing in "Dead George Carlin" but "Lincoln's Ghost" might be a dark horse.Team 'em up and that ticket is pretty intriguing. FWIW, I've always been curious about write-ins and wonder how many votes God and Santa Claus have gotten over the years. Link to post Share on other sites
EL the Famous Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 what value have your own posts served towards increasing and/or uplifting the quality of this thread/debate? obviously, via that post...none. fair point. Link to post Share on other sites
lamradio Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 A ghost president would be the only thing that could scare the terrorists away. Link to post Share on other sites
fatheadfred Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 A ghost president would be the only thing that could scare the terrorists away. Speaking of terrorists, did Homeland Security finally decide the terror alert was bogus? The Repubs lost a powerful campaign tool. In 04 they would move it up and down depending on the polls, debates, and shtuff. Link to post Share on other sites
quarter23cd Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Speaking of terrorists, did Homeland Security finally decide the terror alert was bogus? The Repubs lost a powerful campaign tool. In 04 they would move it up and down depending on the polls, debates, and shtuff.There is still a poster at the entry to my workplace that has the "terror scale" on it and a marker that supposedly shows the current level. No idea if it has been updated recently. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts